Science and technology versus Arts and humanities –should the higher qualified candidates fight for lower jobs?
Subjects changing during the course of time: In the academics, the difference, discrimination and competition between Science and technology versus Arts and humanities have been proverbial, memorable and continuing with time. Before and after independence arts-subjects were considered inferior to other subjects. Thus, some students used to choose B.A. (Hon) and or proceed to law to become advocates. Otherwise, the arts-graduates go for office and administrative work. Typewriting and shorthand became necessary, as the clerk job required such experience. Thus, till 1980s, the type-writer institutes were busy with job-seekers to get one-hour time slot either in the morning or evening. Even today typewriting and Computer typing[1] are insisted or made mandatory for clerical work. After the introduction of the computers, they mechanical typewriters were virtually scrapped and dumped and sold as scrap only. Even the electrical and electronic typewriters faced the same fate[2]. Anyway, computers serve for typewriting and none gets any qualification for computer-typing exclusively.
Discrimination among the engineering graduates, diploma holders and ITI certificate holders: The same type of competition has been there among the engineering degree graduates, diploma holders and ITI certificate holders. There was a general impression till 1980s, only the students who could not do their studies well would go for diploma and ITI. However, many times in industries, the ITI certificate holders work better than diploma holders and the diploma holders than the degree holders, because of the more practical training in handling with tools and machines, they had than others. Of course, from 1990 onwards, the workshops attached to the engineering colleges started imparting all practical training to the engineering students and thus, they were also exposed all types of drilling, honing, cutting, profiling, polishing processes and other machinery. In fact, they are sent to leading manufacturing factories under internship to get such experience. Yet, we find 50-60-70 years old workers with or without qualifications excelling others on the floor of many factories.
Candidates with higher qualifications cannot apply for lower posts: Many times, when getting a job is necessary or difficult, the candidates with higher qualifications used to suppress their higher qualifications and appear in competitive examinations with S.S.L.C, P.U.C and matric qualifications, as with degree, they cannot apply for clerical / typist job. In fact, there would be “Warning / Caution” to the extent, that “Higher qualification holders need not apply.” However, as the unemployment problem was acute, the degree holders had to get some jobs and proceed further. In fact, some used to do part-time job in the evening one or twor hours and go home. Because, for poor and lower middle-class people, they had to earn money for running the family. Now, the Supreme Court categorically pronounced in a judgment[3], “…a candidate with higher qualification cannot claim right to apply for posts with lower qualification, unless the relevant statutory recruitment rules permit the inference that higher qualification presupposes the acquisition of lower qualification”! However, there are contrary judgments also.
Peon with degree can continue to work as a peon: The Judgment – Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank & Anr. v. Anit Kumar Das [Civil Appeal No. 3602 of 2020], held that lower educational qualification can be a criterion for employment of a candidate, given that there is a rationale behind it[4]. The appellant Bank had invited applications for the post of Peon by publishing an advertisement in the local newspaper. The advertisement clearly mentioned the eligibility criteria for the candidate to have passed the 12th class or its equivalent and basic reading/writing knowledge of English. It also specifically provided that the candidate should not be a graduate. The respondent, upon submitting the applications got selected for employment, after which it came to the knowledge of the appellant that the respondent was in fact a graduate, and thus, his candidature was cancelled. Aggrieved, the respondent filed a writ petition before the High Court arguing that higher education cannot be a basis for denying employment, relying on Mohd. Usmain Gani v. District and Sessions Judge, Nagpur [Civil Appeal No. 1010 of 2000]. The HC allowed the petition and directed the Bank to allow the respondent to discharge his duties as a Peon.
Central and State government employees are governed by the Conduct Rules: The rationale is by acquiring higher qualifications later, he cannot claim any salary, promotion and other benefits. As for as the government employees, the conduct rules have been very specific and the joining employee has to give all the details required at the time of joining. Not only about his qualification, but also about his marital status, caste, religion and family details. He should inform the department / employer to get permission to pursue the higher study by giving an undertaking letter with conditions. Therefore, he cannot change his stand or go to court etc., as he is bound by the conduct rules. Unless, the conduct rules infringe the provisions of the Constitution, he cannot go to court also. Even for going to court, he should get permission from the department / employer. With all the restrictions, he has every right to get his qualified status, provided, had in informed. As the government deals with crores of people all over the country in thousands of departments, it hs to control the employers with such Conduct Rules.
For employment purposes equating or differentiating the similar degrees: The Tamil Nadu government has recently issued a G.O / ordinance regarding the unique academic list, which has affected those who have completed the course in ancient history and archaeology at the University of Madras[5]. In February, 2024 an expert panel deliberated on which courses are non-equivalent as defined by the University Grants Commission, UGC. Based on the recommendations made by the committee, the Tamil Nadu government recently issued a G.O / ordinance. In it, a list of courses which are not equivalent to Botany and History Department courses has been published. That is to say, the MA degree in Ancient History and Archeology offered by Madras University is not equivalent to the MA History degree. Due to this, those who have completed MA in Ancient History and Archeology in Chennai University cannot apply for jobs related to history[6]. Thus, such degree holders feel that they have been deprived of applying for jobs with their qualifications.
The Students of Ancient History and Archaeology apprehended their opportunity: In this regard, the MA, Ancient History and Archeology degree holders of Madras University said[7]: “Now, the Teachers Selection Board has released a notification for the recruitment of History Professors. For this, a new order has been issued so that even those who have obtained MA, Ancient History and Archeology degree and passed the ‘NET’ examination in Madras University cannot apply. In Central and State archeology departments and in the history education department, those who have studied in Madras University have achieved the most. They have effectively done various excavations in Tamil Nadu and contributed to history. Similarly, coins, inscriptions, palm-leaf mss etc. have also been investigated and history has been written. The Tamil Nadu government has issued a wrong order so that archaeologists cannot apply for the jobs of the archeology department while the history department is eligible to apply for the jobs in the history department. As a result, it will not be possible to conduct courses on ancient history and archaeology in the history curriculum, and employment will be lost for hundreds of qualified and talented academics who have studied in Madras University and done research and written many history books. This will have a major impact on archaeology graduates and students. On the other hand, archaeology graduates from Tanjore Tamil University are not barred from working in the history department. It is a discriminatory G.O. Government should take steps to change this and continue the old practice.”
Technically and scientifically different subjects cannot be equated: A careful reading of the order and its contents are summarized as follows:
Degree subject / subjects combined | Not equivalent to |
B.A English Language & Literature | B.A. English |
B.Sc Microbiology | B.Sc Botany |
B.Sc Environmental Biology | B.Sc Botany |
M.Sc Microbiology | M.Sc Botany |
M.Sc Environmental Biology | M.Sc Botany |
M.Sc Environmental science | M.Sc Botany |
M.Sc Biotechnology | M.Sc Botany |
M.Sc Pharmaceutical Chemistry | M.Sc chemistry |
M.Sc (Agriculture) Agronomy | M.Sc Agriculture (Extension) |
M.Sc (Agriculture) Entomology | M.Sc Agriculture (Extension) |
B.A. (History, Sociology, Philosophy) | B.A. History |
B.A. (History, Sociology, Telugu Literature) | B.A. History |
B.A Political History | B. A. History |
M.A. Medieval History | M.. history |
M.A. Political Science | M. A. History |
M.A. Ancient History & Archaeology | M. A. History |
Definitely, the subject, subject content and the syllabi of them have been different. Therefore, they cannot be compared or equated. Even a cursory look at the subjects shows how they are different. The subjects on the RHS appear to be specialized, specific and combo types meant for certain jobs, thus offered in different universities of India. In fact, they are higher standards than the normal M.A / M.Sc or B.A / B.Sc degrees. Hence, instead of barring certain subjects or disciplines, if the job does not require any expertise and is capable of managing the job with the degree held, then, the required qualification can be made in general as M.A / M.Sc or B.A / B.Sc degrees or it can simply be mentioned, “Any graduate can apply”. If specialization is required, then, naturally, no compromise can be made.
What students, candidates and others should ponder over: With all the above exigencies, one should take decision as follows:
- Every candidate should be conscious about what he reads, in which subject, he can excel and try to proceed in that discipline.
- Of course, nowadays, certain factors compel the candidates for going to different disciplines due to economic, forced and other factors and conditions.
- As specialization of subjects started or each subject is masqueraded with different terminology, syllabus and so on, such subjects continue to increase and thrive.
- In science and technology, the candidates could survive by updating, studying M.S and other studies to fulfill their job requirements.
- Whereas, the students of arts and humanities have to acquire more and different diplomas to compete in the job market.
- In any case, the employers (private sector) expect the candidates to join and start working immediately.
- In the public / government jobs, immediately, the employees try to protest and take recourse to other methods.
- In any case, they are governed by the conduct rules and the prevailing Supreme Court judgments.
- Better aim for the suitable jobs with the qualifications one has, than aim for other ones attracting or forced on.
- Whatever job, one gets, be loyal to the job and the employer, so it would award the sincere employee always.
© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao
11-04-2024
[1] In government offices, mostly the computers are used as typewriters only, otherwise, the staff may be browsing. Some may use Excel for accounting and financial purposes.
[2] Most of the factories manufacturing mechanical, electrical and electronic type writers [Halda, Remington etc.,] were closed down and disappeared from the market.
[3] Zahoor Ahmad Rather vs Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad on 5 December, 2018, AIRONLINE 2018 SC 872; https://indiankanoon.org/doc/85514936/
[4] Prime Legal, Employers cannot prescribe arbitrary qualifications for jobs: Supreme Court,
[5] Higher Education (K1) Department – G.O. (Ms) No. 72 dated 15-03-2024.
[6] தினமலர், சென்னை பல்கலை தொல்லியல் பட்டம் பெற்றவர்களுக்கு சிக்கல், UPDATED : ஏப் 10, 2024 03:34 AM; ADDED : ஏப் 10, 2024 03:34 AM.
[7] https://www.dinamalar.com/news/tamil-nadu-news/-chennai-university-archeology-graduates-have-a-problem–/3596966
Filed under: academic, academicia, accounts, agriculture, anthropology, antiquity, archaeology, Artificial Intelligence, arts, astronomy, auditing, ayurveda, certificate, cosmogony, cosmology, curriculum, degree, diploma, discrimination, economics, genetics, genography, geo-archaeology, geoarchaeology, geometry, higher qualification, historiography, historiosophy, history, history curriculum, humanities, indology, internship, invention, ITI, job, job market, job-market, job-oriented, salvage archaeology, Social science, sociology | Tagged: academicia, academics, arts, certificate, computer, degree, diploma, education, forensic science, higher qualification, history job, humanities, ITI, job, job market, job-market, job-opportunities, job-oriented, jobless, jobs, news, non-academicia, opportunities, qualification, required qualification, science, technology, typewriter | Leave a comment »