Culture at cross-roads? – the International conference held at the University of Madras on March 14th and 15th 2024 (2)
14-03-2024 afternoon session[1]: The afternoon’s session (3 pm to 5:30 pm) commenced with a special lecture by Dr. Ananta Kumar Giri, who talked about what lies beyond cross cultures. It was followed by the 1st technical session from, where Assistant Professors of Post Graduate and Research Department of Historical Studies of Government Arts College for Men, Dr. M. Palani and Dr. J. Sadayamuthu preceded as the Chair and Co-chair respectively. There were six presentations in this session. All the presenters focused on how various ideas, disciplines, concepts and issues overlap with cultures.
Simultaneously, competition and cultural exhibitions were held where participants took part in Poster making, Crafts and Culinary exhibitions on the theme “Cultural diversity”. The judges for the competition were Ms. Arokiya Anbazhagi, Assistant Professor, Department of History, Women’s Christian College and Dr. Sasikala, Head of the Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Madras. The first day of the International Conference concluded with a talk by the chairperson Dr. M Palani.
15-03-2024 – the second day of proceedings: The second day was held on 15th March 2024. It started with the 2nd technical session from 9:15 – 10:30 am with 8 presenters who presented a large variety of disciplines that interact with culture from street art to food, from uniform civil code to globalization. This session was chaired by Dr. M.P. Damodaran – Head of the Department of Anthropology.
It was followed by the 3rd technical session from 10:45am – 1pm chaired by Dr. Pareshwar Sahoo – Assistant professor in the Department of History at Utkal University and co-chaired by Dr. T Kausalyakumari– Head of the department of History – Ethiraj College. There were 7 presenters who focused on the topics such as women’s participation in politics, menstrual hygiene, archaeology, culture in early Madras and cultural identity vs intellectual property rights.
The student-paper presenters, generally had dealt with the topics taken for the purpose.
The paper presenter delved upon the topic of “theatre hall” and went on to list out all such auditoriums, halls, theatres, lecture halls etc., making sweeping remarks, before the establishment of such halls by the British, there was no culture (perhaps theatre culture) in Madras!
The paper presented on “menstrual hygienic”: The topic dealt with “menstrual hygienic” has been limited, but, making conclusions universal. Already many has researched in this topic[2]. It has been a favourite topic for many[3]. In Tamilnadu itself, there have been many studies covering Salem[4]. She conducted a survey with an English questionnaire, where, the subjects do not know English. This type of research has to be careful, as with the few samples, it cannot decide the fate of an entire state or country. Just by surveying the conditions of 100 persons, one cannot conclude the conditions of 100 crores population. She was stressing as if such “taboo” has been peculiar in India, without mentioning such taboo prevalent in other countries, perhaps, throughout the world. The Google Scholar shows thousands of books and papers on the topic[5] and therefore, it is better the paper presenter avoid bias and interpret the data restricting to her chosen area.
Intellectual property rights of the indigenous people: The Indian tribes, traditional knowledge etc., have been also a favourite topic[6]. The indigenous and tribals have many skills in science and technology, but they pass on them to their progeny from generation to generation[7]. They are not registering their cultural heritage and hence, others are copying and using it. Actually, in India, the Vanavasis (forest-dwelling people) were never disturbed and they continued to live with their facilities. Even today, few islands of Andaman & Nicobar are not disturbed, as the indigenous tribes living there for millions of years never want to mix with others. Food, medicine and other requirements are provided periodically, some persons come and take them away, but, none are allowed to enter their islands.
Culture at crossroads – how it affects the Acts and Rules applicable to Indian women in 21st century: K. V. Ramakrishna Rao – Culture at crossroads – how it affects the Acts and Rules applicable to Indian women in the 21st century. After discussing about many case laws, he concluded as follows: As it has been mentioned as “crossroads,” what the roads crossing each other has to be mentioned specifically, as it cannot be hypothetical. When people or peoples meet at the “crossroads,” i.e, the place of intersection of two or more roads, the action, interaction and counteraction among them have to be studied. Thus, the judiciary, judicial judgments and Acts applicable to civil society have to be secularized completely.
- Utopian concepts of egalitarianism in all spheres of Indians can be achieved only by true and complete secularization of Indian society leading to Social Justice.
- Therefore, religion should definitely be treated as personal concept instead of putting it on national agenda.
- As the ideals of Social Justice can be materialized by actual commitment, keeping reality in mind, all efforts should be taken to have uniform civil and criminal laws in the Indian context.
- If the secularization process is completed in true spirit, then there will not be any objection to such uniform civil code. For this broad-minded, educated and liberal scholars of secular but religious personalities should be consulted without any discrimination on any factor. As the UCC Bill introduced in 2019 has been still pending even in 2024, Indians may have to wait and see.
- In such process, not only the Indian Constitution, but also all Acts and rules can be secularized to the satisfaction of all sections of Indian society.
- But, unless all Indians follow them strictly, the ideals may not be implemented.
- Therefore, the people should not only be taught about their rights, but also others should sincerely help them to get their rights with responsibility.
- Thus, it is believed that Indians would achieve Social Justice through secular principles.
Archaeology, Processural archaeology and Cultural archaeology – are they at loggerheads or crossroads?: J. Soundaraajan and K. V. Ramakrishna Rao discussed about Archaeology, Processural archaeology and Cultural archaeology in the context of culture. After discussing the issues, he concluded as follows:
- As historical and archaeological chronologies have been different, they have to be correlated, corroborated and corresponded for the purpose.
- How the prehistoric (archaeological) dates and historic (written) evidences could be brought together at a meeting point has to be considered.
- Whether historical and archaeological cultures could be fit into such chronology or not- should be decided with the eras, dates and chronograms appearing in the inscriptions.
- Now archaeo-astronomical evidences and datings are not accepted by the field-archaeologists, but, they are used by others in the multi-disciplinary approach, even in the megalithic sites.
- The study of cultural change in the countries like India, is very difficult. As the vast country with the largest coastal areas had been interacting with many other cultures, the cross-cultural, cultural influence and related processes would vary during every 50-100 years, yet, the culture exhibited show some commonness.
- The 2500 years old sculptural evidences prove orderliness of the Indian art and architecture.
- The 3500-2500 years old literature and other non-material culture also show such uniqueness with less variance.
- All such consistencies are noted even in 21st century proves that processural archaeology also works in India.
- Thus, coming to the question – Archaeology, Processural archaeology and Cultural archaeology – are they at loggerheads or crossroads? – answer can be given – Yes.
The following papers were also presented:
Ganesan – Lambadis
Venkatesan – Tirukkural
Ramesh – Rock art of Tamilnadu
Vibin – Temples in Kanyakumari
© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao
Note: I was expecting inputs from our friends and waiting. As I could not get it, I posted this second part with the available material.
19-03-2024
[1] Based on the report received from the one of the convenors Dr Vamana Praphu Kumari.
[2] Sinha, Rabindra Nath, and Bobby Paul. “Menstrual hygiene management in India: The concerns.” Indian journal of public health 62.2 (2018): 71-74.
[3] Kamath, R., et al. “A study on knowledge and practices regarding menstrual hygiene among rural and urban adolescent girls in Udupi Taluk, Manipal, India.” Global journal of medicine and public health 2.4 (2013): 1-9.
[4] Balamurugan, S. Sangeetha, S. Shilpa, and Sheethal Shaji. “A community based study on menstrual hygiene among reproductive age group women in a rural area, Tamil Nadu.” Journal of Basic and Clinical Reproductive Sciences 3.2 (2014): 83-87.
[5] Van Eijk, A. M., Sivakami, M., Thakkar, M. B., Bauman, A., Laserson, K. F., Coates, S., & Phillips-Howard, P. A. (2016). Menstrual hygiene management among adolescent girls in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open, 6(3), e010290.
[6] Munzer, Stephen R., and Kal Raustiala. “The uneasy case for intellectual property rights in traditional knowledge.” Cardozo Arts & Ent. LJ 27 (2009): 37.
[7] Bengwayan, Michael A. Intellectual and cultural property rights of indigenous and tribal peoples in Asia. London: Minority Rights Group International, 2003.
Filed under: agrarian, ambedkar, ambedkar ideology, antique, antiquity, archaeological remains, archaeological sites, archaeology, arms, arms struggle, Art and Culture of Tamil Nadu, artefact, artifact, blood, body, caste, chola, chola dynasty, cholas, collection, colonial, colony, commerce, conflict, cosmogony, crisis, cross road, cross roads, crossroad, crossroads, crucible, culture, culture at crossroads, current era, curriculum, demythologization, discrimination, epigenetics, ethnicity, ethnology, ethnos, evolution, gender, gene, genetics, genography, geo-archaeology, geoarchaeology, heritage, historicity, historiography, history, history usage, justice, morality, nationalism, phylogeny, political science, politics, pollution, race, racialism, racism, regionalism, researcher, reservation, right, rock art, rock art symbol, scheduled tribe, scholar, sex, sexploitation, sexual, social justice, social reform, spirituality, suppression, UNESCO, UNESCO Heritage, UNESCO Heritage List, woman, women | Tagged: 12000 years of Indian culture, Art and Culture of Tamil Nadu, clash of cultures, clash. clash of cultures, cross road, cross roads, crossroad, crossroads, culture at crossroad, culture at crossroads, divorce, dowry, inheritance, living in, living in relation, marriage, property, woman | Leave a comment »