CAG Report on missing monuments – ASI searching for, found and lost; how and why they are missing, hiding, getting lost etc?
CAG Report on the function of ASI and missing monuments: Whether, 2013 or 2023, the picture does not change, as the monuments, “protected monuments,” listed monuments have been missing from the sites, monuments and paces. As India Today[1] sarcastically noted, “Persons go missing. Valuables, watches, cellphones, pens go missing. Sometimes even coal block allocation files go missing. Now monuments have gone missing; the Ministry of Culture and the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) admit to 35 lost and not found. And it gets worse”. The government has been caught lying to Parliament on this number[2]. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) had indicted the culture ministry and ASI for furnishing incorrect data to Parliament on the number of national monuments that are missing. This has not been new in the ASI history or Indian history or history of archaeology[3]. Just to satisfy, a committee would be formed to trace the missing monuments and they declare that some missing monuments were found[4]. Whenever CAG Report or Audit objections come, every government office used to give some preliminary report and then detailed report as a matter of routine. Interestingly, these issues are discussed for the competitive exams entrance exam coaching classes also.
How monuments in India are missing, hiding, getting lost etc: The media has been describing the issue with its own way in a different manner and with narratives.
- In a scene from Satyajit Ray’s mystery-adventure film Sonar Kella (The Fort of Gold), 1971, one of the antagonists says Rajasthan is a state where every nook and cranny hides a fort or monument, and it will be nearly impossible to know which one is the golden fort[5]. The actors of Ray’s cult classic endure several gruelling adventures before they finally realise that they are looking for the Jaisalmer Fort[6]. Ray’s film reveals an intriguing truth about monuments in India.
- Despite their near-ubiquitous presence in both urban and rural areas, monuments are not always the easiest structures to locate.
- Sometimes it is the stories that blur the maps; at other times they are simply missing.
- Take the tomb of Razia Sultan in Delhi, for instance. The resting place of one of the most-storied women rulers of the medieval India, is an unassuming cluster of weathered sandstones hidden in the packed bylanes of Old Delhi, surrounded by the walls of neighbouring houses, and no roof overhead. The responsibility of its upkeep is on the shoulders of a tiny adjoining mosque with few visitors.
- In Telkupi, a village in West Bengal’s Purulia district, the construction of Panchet dam over the Damodar river submerged a set of six to eight 11th-century stone temples. Only a few remain visible above the surface of water.
- In Karnataka, about 18 km from the Thirthahalli taluk, the 9th-century Kavaledurga Fort valiantly fights off surrounding jungle’s persistent overgrowth. Despite attempts and restoration and maintenance by several succeeding dynasties and kingdoms over the centuries, as well as central and state governments, the fort remains neglected and hidden beneath overgrown shrubs.
Since 2006, the CAG has been pointing out about the missing monuments: The CAG report says that on more than one occasion the culture minister has told Parliament that 35 of its monuments have gone missing. When the CAG checked about 1,655 protected monuments and sites-comprising 45 per cent of the total-they found 92 monuments missing. This is more than 2.5 times the number of its monuments have gone missing. When the CAG checked about 1,655 protected monuments and sites-comprising 45 per cent of the total-they found 92 monuments missing. This is more than 2.5 times the number being provided by the culture ministry since 2006. Since the CAG verification covers about half the total number of monuments, the total figure would be much higher if the inspection covered all monuments. The CAG report has brought the boom down on the ASI for hiding facts, quoting instances where some monuments “missing” in Delhi from the 1970s have not even been listed by the ASI as such. The story of General Nicholson’s statue, a protected monument near Kashmere Gate in the Capital at the time of Independence, is as good an example of the ASI’s inertia as any. The statue was gifted by the government to Ireland in the 1960s, but the ASI has been unaware of the transfer till recently. Of course, the statue still features in the list of protected monuments.
The vested commercialization and politicization lead to encroachments and disappearance of monuments: The CAG audit has found that the premier custodian of our heritage does not even know the number of monuments it is supposed to protect. It has been found that the ASI does not even possess notification documents for many of its monuments. This document is the legal basis of the boundary of a monument, and is the prime tool to beat back encroachments, the bane of common properties and public spaces in India. The CAG audit also says that these valuable monuments across the country are sites of neglect, marred as they are by encroachments and unauthorised constructions. Once again, the auditor has caught the ASI sleeping, as it notes that in its inspection of 1,655 of centrally protected monuments there were encroachments in around 546 monuments as against 249 intimated by the ASI. The nation’s showpiece monuments-the Taj Mahal and Red Fort- are not better off, the report says. Red Fort in Delhi has poorly maintained gardens, and its water channels have yet to be made operational. An illegal mazaar and temple have come up inside Red Fort in recent years; prayers are being offered at both places. Similarly, only one of 24 unauthorised constructions near the Taj Mahal has been removed. The more the tourist flow, the more the shops, hotels, touts, agents and all sorts of related activities. The more the space encroached near to the monuments, the more the profits, where all deals start and thus, the ASI Acts and Rules are simply forgotten.
In India, for everything and anything, there have been hundreds of Acts and Rules: To oversee archaeological excavations and conservation, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) was founded in 1869. Numerous protected monuments were placed under the ASI’s care between the 1920s and the 1950s. The Antiquities and Art Treasure Act of 1972 is also governed by it. James Cunningham, a British Army engineer who had a passion for Indian archaeology, founded it in 1861. After gaining independence, it became a statutory body under the AMASR Act of 1958. The Director-General of the ASI is in charge, and New Delhi serves as its headquarters. The Government of India’s Ministry of Culture is home to the Archaeological Survey of India, or ASI. It works to protect and preserve the nation’s historic buildings and archaeological sites as well as conduct archaeological research. The provisions of the 1958 Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act (AMASR Act) are used by ASI to regulate all archaeological activities carried out in the nation. Following independence, the functioning of ASI was hampered by the poor policies of the succeeding governments, which placed a greater emphasis on infrastructure, education, and health than on preserving cultural heritage.
How monuments, temples, sculptures etc have been missing or made to miss: The ASI officials claim that activities like encroachments, the building of dams and reservoirs, and rapid urbanisation have slowly sunk many monuments and heritage sites. Yes, but, why ASI has not been able to implement its authority is surprising. When for infrastructure development, the government has been keen to put road, construct dam, dug a tunnel, break mound, and so on.so when such activities are planned and they go through their decided areas, the planners ignore the “monuments” and only think about “development.” Of course, in the tender, MOU, agreement etc., there have been hundreds of conditions printed in the documents running to 200-300 pages and one should have patience to go through and understand. In spite of all conditions, when the project starts, many trees are cut, temple walls demolished, why even temples were demolished silently during night times under the guise of shifting or promising to relocate and so on[7]. If few people are there, they can be easily managed and none would know, except, when pilgrims come to identify, knw and declare that the temple is missing.
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism, and Culture received the report, “Issues Relating to Untraceable Monuments and Protection of Monuments in India.”50 of India’s 3,693 centrally protected monuments under ASI, according to the Union Ministry of Culture’s submission to the Parliament, are now untraceable, raising serious concerns. ASI safeguards and preserves more than 3500 protected monuments and archaeological sites of national significance.
- 14 monuments have been engulfed by rapid urbanisation, according to the ASI submission in Parliament.
- By building dams and reservoirs, as many as 12 monuments have been submerged, and 24 have vanished.
- Only 248 of the 3,693 monuments are reportedly guarded, according to the report. Due to financial limitations, the government could only afford to provide 2,578 security personnel at 248 locations, according to the report.
- Eleven monuments are missing from Uttar Pradesh, two from each of Delhi and Haryana, and others are missing from Assam, West Bengal, Arunachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand, among other states.
- Other missing monuments include:
- the Guns of Emperor Sher Shah, Tinsukia (Assam);
- the Ruins of Copper Temple, Paya, Lohit (Arunachal Pradesh); Kos Minar, Mujesar, Faridabad (Haryana);
- Kutumbari Temple, Dwarahat, Almora (Uttarakhand);
- Rock Inscription, Satna (Madhya Pradesh);
- Old European Tomb, Pune (Maharashtra);
- 12th Century Temple, Baran (Rajasthan); and
- Telia Nala Buddhist ruins, Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh).
According to the Ministry, untraceable monuments are those that, despite numerous ASI efforts, could not be located on the ground for a sizable period of time. As cited by the Indian Express, the ASI officials claim that no physical surveys of any monuments were ever done following Independence. Nevertheless, according to a Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report from 2013, the nation’s at least 92 centrally protected monuments were believed to be missing. The CAG report claims that the ASI lacked information on the precise number of monuments it was responsible for protecting[8]. The CAG report recommended that ASI officers conduct routine inspections of each protected monument. Even though the Ministry approved the proposal, there was little evidence of appropriate action[9]. In 2017 itself, Minister of Culture (in charge of archaeology etc) gave a list of monuments[10].
© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao
30-04-2023
[1] India Today, CAG discovers 92 protected monuments missing, slams ASI for negligence, Edited By: At Migration, Published On: Aug 24, 2013.
[2] https://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/story/cag-discovers-protected-monuments-missing-slams-asi-174812-2013-08-23
[3] The Hindu, Special ASI committee to trace 24 ‘missing’ monuments, THE HINDU BUREAU, February 05, 2023 10:40 pm | Updated February 06, 2023 07:51 am IST – New Delhi
[4] https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/special-asi-committee-to-trace-24-missing-monuments/article66474342.ece
[5] Business Standard, Withering legacies: A curious tale of India’s ‘missing’ monuments, Debarghya SanyalNew Delhi, Last Updated : Feb 15 2023 | 12:04 PM IST
[6] https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/withering-legacies-a-curious-tale-of-missing-india-s-monuments-123021301558_1.html
[7] Here, perhaps the Idol smugglers and the related persons might have a nexus, as they only knew which temples were demolished, how many parts, pillars, sculptures, idols etc., were removed, delivered safely and faithfully, damaged and missing.
[8] India Times, Explained: How Did 50 ASI-Protected Monuments Disappear?, Hera Rizwan, Updated on Jan 08, 2023, 11:24 IST.
[9] https://www.indiatimes.com/explainers/news/explained-how-did-50-asi-protected-monuments-disappear-589674.html
[10] Unstrred question no.5913 answered on 10-04-2017 about the survey conducted about the missing of documents: https://eparlib.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/701331/1/52351.pdf
Filed under: ASI, audit, audit objection, CAG, dating, demolition, demythologization, historian politician, historical politician, historicity, historiography, historiosophy, history, ideological, idol, idol-lifting, idol-smuggling, idol-theft, innovation, inscription, interpretation, missing monuments, monument, relocate, renovation, repair, rescue, rescue archaeology, research, smelting, smuggling, story, stupa, subject, submerged, submerged sites, submerged temple, technology, temple, temple attack, temple demolition, tomb, tool, tourism, tradition, Uncategorized, updating, worker | Tagged: archaeological survey of India, archaeologist, archaeology, archaeology department, archeological, ASI, audit, audit objection, CAG, cag report, encroach, encroachment, geo-archaeology, geoarchaeology, idol missing, idol theft, idol-smuggling, illegal, missing monument, monument, monument missing, occupation, paleobotanical research, rescue archaeology, temple buried, temple demolition, temple desecration | Leave a comment »