The origin, development and importance of Memorial-stones in India (4)

The origin, development and importance of Memorial-stones in India (4)

Sind / Sindh had been part of India / Bhart for centuries, till Arabs invaded and tried to Islamize……

The warriors of Sindh were resisting them with their valour……

However, they could not match with the cunningness of their enemies, when they were following the code of conduct of war etc…..

In 712, the invasion started, within 300 – 400 years, Sindh was Islamized……

and slowly, all the monuments, temples, sculptures etc., started disappearing, as the iconoclasts were destroying them regularly……

now the condition of Hro-stones are like this…….

Hero-stones in Sind: Lower Sindh in southern Pakistan is dotted with many ancient cemeteries boasting the tombs of fallen heroes, and stones erected in memory of their heroism and chivalry (Hero stones). Most of the tombstones bear weaponry depictions symbolizing death in the line of action or at least participation in battle. They are found at Oongar in the district of Thatta, province of Sindh and , a Jats burial site, is located fifty kilometres from the city of Hyderabad, close to the Buddhist stupa of Sudheran in the district of Tando Muhammad Khan, also in Sindh[1]. One finds inscriptional slabs lying all over the site at the cemetery of the Jats but it is difficult to find any inscriptions at all at the Oongar necropolis since all of the chaukhandis have disintegrated and not a single tombstone is in its original condition[2]. In other words, they were destroyed and only parts are available there now. Hero-stones and sati stones found in the Sind province of present Pakistan has been pointed out by many and also noted that they are disappearing[3]. Central Asian and Bactrian areas exhibit broken sculptures of many panels and they are identified and interpreted differently. As the Indian kings / people were massacred there, it is mentioned as Hindu-kush = Hindus blood i.e,  the Hindus were  completely routed and eliminated there, and hence, memorial stones must have been erected. Till “Hindu-kush” occurred incidence at that area, they were there struggling with invading groups. Thus, only left out monuments have been recorded by Auriel Stein during his exploration. After Talibanization, even sculptures in the museums were destroyed and therefore, the fate of the sculptures and paintings found at the sites cannot be imagined.

Memorial stones in Cambodia / Siam / Thailand: In the Siamese culture, schools pointed out about the bloody sacrifice to the Earth Goddess offered at the Door of the Underworld, an ancient tree, a termite mound, a cave, a ring of stones[4]. At the time of the Buddhist ordination ceremony and its site, the Uposatha hall was surrounded by a ring of stones. Michael Wright noted that, “There is no evidence that these stones were developed from anything in India or Lanka, whereas scholars have proposed an affinity with prehistoric circles of rough-hewn stones found in the Northeast.” However, as the South Indian merchant guilds were having close contacts with these areas, there were possibilities that some sailors, merchants and other crew members might have died there and they might have erected memorial stones for them. Stone circles are considered as memorial stones, as noted above. Here, in the Siamese tradition, as there had been mixture of several peoples, the changes noted would be appreciable. Whether such circle stones were used for good or bad purposes – is also difficult to ascertain now. In any case, they were associated with sacrifice / death only.

Interpreting death, last rites and memorial stones in the context of race, language etc., by the colonial and other ideologists: Indians must have had their territory touching the other dominant civilizations like Sumerian, Egyptian, Persian, Greek and Chinese. Thus, their influence on the other cultures has been appreciable. That is why most of the people of the ancient civilizations wanted to come to India.  Indologists were pointing out such similarities and facts during last 150-300 years, but, suddenly changed their attitude. Thus, they changed their theory of the origin of race from the Ganges valley to other places[5]. The historiography was also changed accordingly. The glorification of Indian civilization turned to criticizing even disparaging. This attitude could be noted from the works of William Jones also. With the history writing of Vincent Smith, the Indian history was reduced to 2000 years starting with the Alexander’s invasion / Asokan script. About philosophy, initially, the world scholars accepted that India was the origin of philosophy, thus, every book of philosophy started with Indian philosophy. Thus, the fight started between India and Greece and Indian history has been made to start after Alexander’s invasion, the “sheet anchor of” Indian history. Then, “Aryan-Dravidian” race theory was introduced to dive, but the underlying concepts (rites conducted from birth to death) match with each other. However, the comprehensive and holistic study of Hero-stones gives a different picture. Again, one could note the commonality, in spite of the fact that such practices were carried on far and wide and even chronologically varied from Bronze Age to Modern Age.

Conclusion: Only few examples have been given for each area and state for illustrative purposes. An exhaustive study can also be made incorporating all details after conducting field study and reading local literature. Thus, with limited study and the above discussion, the following points are noted as conclusion:

• The belief in soul, transmigration of soul, karma, life after death, rebirth, cycle of birth and death, etc., have been the basis for the creation of the memorial stone.
• Even during the Bronze Age period, Indian Hero-stones were found in the Central Asia, but, portions were destroyed.
• There is difficult in connecting protohistory with historic narratives in the Indian context, as historians have such thumb rule.
• Logically, scientifically and technologically, such restriction appears to be artificial, inconsistent and redundant considering many other archaeological, material and scientific evidences.
• After the Mahabharat War around 3102 BCE, the participant armies with warriors dispersed and started moving to their destination[6]. However, as some could not reach, they settled down on the way and they became new dynasties and people groups. However, many commonalities could be noted among these people groups[7].  Jains – essences, gymnosophists (people wearing no dress or white dress); Rajaputs – Scythians, etc[8].
• The Hero-stones were found in the areas of Central Asia, Gandhara, Sind and other provinces on the west and Burma, Siam, Kedah etc., on the East.
• That Indic / Hindu / Vedic / Sanatana believing people were living in many parts of the world, at a particular time can also be understood and known from the prevalent of memorial stones and related philosophy.
• Thus, the memorial stone erection had been an Indian practice found from the Bronze Age to 18^th century.
• The dichotomy of dividing Indians based on race, language etc., is also cleared considering the prevalence of memorial stones in different places as pointed out, as “karma” continues!

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

09-05-2024

---

[1] Kalhoro, Zulfiqar Ali. “Memorial Stones of Sindh, Pakistan: Typology and Iconography.” Puralokbarta 1 (2015): 285-298.

[2] . According to the notables of Oongar, village people have purportedly removed many of the decorative slabs either to sell in the lucrative markets in such items or simply in order to decorate their drawing rooms with these valuable pieces of art. Kalhoro, Zulfiqar Ali. “Vanishing Visual Heritage: Sati and Hero-stones in Nagarparkar, Sindh.” P.54

[3] Kalhoro, Zulfiqar Ali. “Vanishing Visual Heritage: Sati and Hero-stones in Nagarparkar, Sindh.” Journal of Indian Society of Oriental Art 27 (2010): 232-238.

[4] Wright, Michael. “Sacrifice and the underworld: death and fertility in Siamese myth and ritual.” Journal of the Siam Society 78.part 1 (1990).

[5] Léon Poliakov. The Aryan Myth: A History of Racist and Nationalist Ideas in Europe. New York, 1974.

As the European Indologists were using the expression “Aryan,” perhaps, even the Sanskrit scholar like B.G. Tilak was misled and tried to locate the Aryan origin to “Arctic region.”

[6]  Even the Greeks were mentioned as “degraded khastriyas,” by old Indologists, but, such details were suppressed later in 20^th century itself.

[7] Pococke, Edward. India in Greece; Or, Truth in Mythology... Griffin, 1856.

[8]  These are discussed by Richrd Garbe, Col. Tod and others linking Christianity with India, lost tribes etc.

National seminar on “Minor Deities in Indian Art,” held at the C. P. Ramaswami Aiyar Institute of Indological Research, Chennai on March 28th and 29th 2024 (1).

National seminar on “Minor Deities in Indian Art,” held at the C. P. Ramaswami Aiyar Institute of Indological Research, Chennai on March 28^th and 29^th 2024 (1).

C. P. Ramswami Aiyar Institute of Indological Research: C. P. Ramswami Aiyar Institute of Indological Research (CPRIIR) have been regularly conducting conferences and seminars on the important topics connected with Indology[1]. They also bring out a journal, “The Journal of Indian History and Culture” regularly[2]. Some of the journals can be downloaded from here[3]. They have also brought out many books during the course of time. It is also affiliated to the University of Madras for doing PhD. Now, they organized a seminar focused on “Minor Deities in Indian Art,” on March 28^th and 29^th 2024 at their premises, Eladams Road, Chennai. Their circular gave the details of the seminar, theme etc as follows.

Seminar on the “minor deities”: Indian art and culture have been profoundly influenced by a multitude of deities, each with its own unique attributes, symbolism, and significance. While major deities like Vishnu, Shiva, and Devi have received extensive attention in both art and scholarship, there exists a rich tradition of minor deities that play vital roles in Indian religious and artistic traditions. These minor deities, often associated with specific regions, communities and narratives, have their own captivating stories and iconographic representations. In the ancient world, the veneration of natural powers was embodied by deities, both male and female, held prominence. The examination of archaic sources and archaeological remains has unveiled compelling evidence of reverence for nature manifesting through trees and animals and the symbolic significance of sacred symbols. Minor deities encompass a wide spectrum of beings, including local deities, demi-gods, guardian spirits and divine attendants. They represent the plurality and syncretism of Indian religious traditions, with each region and community often having its own set of minor deities.

“Minor deities” – related issues: Minor deities in Indian art are characterized by unique iconographic features and symbolism. Their depiction in sculpture, painting and other artistic forms reveal intricate details of specific attributes and narratives. These symbols and attributes serve as a visual language that conveys the deity’s role, personality and significance. Some examples of minor deities include the Ashtadikpalakas, Navagrahas, 12 Adityas as well as lesser-known forms of the main gods, such as Shastha, forms of Devi and the avataras of Vishnu, demi-gods in Buddhism and Jainism. This seminar aims to delve into the less-explored world of minor deities in Indian art, providing a platform for researchers to share insights into their iconography, mythology and regional significance.The seminar will encompass a wide range of themes related to minor deities in Indian art, including, but not limited to –

1. Iconography and Symbolism of Minor Deities
2. Regional Variations in Depictions
3. Minor Deities in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism
4. Minor Deities in Folk and Tribal Art
5. Rituals and Worship of Lesser-Known Deities
6. Literary Sources on Minor Deities

The proceedings of the seminar would be published to serve as a valuable resource for researchers and enthusiasts interested in the study of minor deities in Indian Art. Additionally, it would foster collaborations among scholars and institutions for future research endeavours in this field.

About the papers: The CPRIIR invited scholars and academics to submit their abstracts of research papers on or before February 25, 2024 emphasizing that the abstracts should be in English and within 500 words in Times New Roman font, 12 point.  It should include the title of the paper, name of the author, institutional affiliation, e-mail address and five keywords.  A short bio-data of the author (s), not exceeding half a typed page, should be sent along with the abstract.  The acceptance of the abstracts would be notified by February 28, 2024. The abstracts should be sent to cpriirconference@gmail.com on or before the closing date. Any other information may be obtained from the same mail address. Outstation participants are advised to make their own arrangements for accommodation. Participants should register themselves on or before March 15, 2024, as they were limiting the number of participants.

28-03-2024 inaugural session – Nandita speaking……….

28-03-2024 inaugural session – Nandita speaking……….another view

28-03-2024 inaugural session – Nandita speaking……….yet another view

28-03-2024 – First day proceedings: On March 28^th, the seminar was inaugurated by Prof Maruti Nandan Prasad Tiwari, Chairman, Indian Art History Congress, Professor Emeritus, Banaras Hindu University. With the introduction by Dr Nandita Krishna Director of the Institute and the traditional lighting of “Kuttuvilakku,” the seminar was started. Dr Nandita Krishna explained the theme of the seminar with examples of “minor deities.” Her booklet “Groves and Gods of Tamilnadu” was also circulated. In his hey-note address, Prof Tiwari talked about, “Minor deities and pacifying goddess of diseases – Shitala in Indian tradition and art” and his paper was circulated. Then, the invited speakers presented their papers.

28-03-2024 inaugural session – audience LHS from the podium..

28-03-2024 inaugural session – audience RHS from the podium..

op 28-03-2024 inaugural session – audience LHS from the podium..middle and backside

Sitaladevi – Prof Maruti Nandan Prasad Tiwari: Prof Tiwari explained about the Sital devi and compared it with Mariamma of South India. The “Saat Sahelis”, or “Seven Sisters or Friends,” generally depicted that included Sïtalå devi. They were ˜Sïtalå, Masånï, Basanti, Mahå Mål, Polamde, Lamkanijå, and Agwanï. Elsewhere, they are ˜Sïtalå, Phulmatï, Camariyå, Durgå Kålï, Mahå Kålï, Bhadrå Kålï and Kålikå Bhavånï. The tradition of the group of seven, with minor variations in names, was thus widespread. There is one Temple at Modhera in Gujarat. Sitala is also depicted with a twelve-armed nude figure is riding on an ass. The few surviving hands have varadåkamudrå, trisula, àamaru, pitcher, and a winnowing fan in the uppermost pair of hands. The sculptors delighted in the classical shape of the dagger, with its efficient double curvature for greater lethal effect, and gutters to drain off blood. But on the other hand, the winnowing fans and brooms, never the stock-in-trade of art, have rustic forms. The literary and inscriptional evidences point to 7th and 13th centuries CE. He concluded that the iconographic features of the goddess were standardized in the 11th century and that images mostly occur with te textual prescriptions in respect of her ass mount and the distinguishing attributes, winnowing basket, sweeping broom, and water-vessel. Though, the majority goddesses Parvti, Lakshmi, Saraswati and others are there, Sitaladevi also became popular.

For illustrative purposes, these photos are added here for understanding the topic, but, not that of the author and they are available in the public domain.

Chitra Madhavan’s Satyaki[4]: Dr. Chitra Madhavan Historian and Writer, Chennai presented he paper on “Satyaki – A lesser known deity.” The Parthasarathi Svami temple in Thiruvallikeni is one of the 108 Divya Desams, praised in the Tamil verses (Pasuram) of the Azhvars or Vaishnava saints. Pey Azhvar, Thirumazhisai Azhvar and Thirumangai Azhvar have sung about the deities enshrined inside the temple complex. It is the processional image (utsava-murti), known as Parthasarathi, from whom the temple takes its name.This east-facing deity is thus called as he is Krishna the charioteer (Sarathy) of Partha (Arjuna). The marks on his face are believed to be caused by arrows shot by the Kauravas having pierced this weaponless charioteer in the Kurukshetra war. The main image on the east side, seen with a white moustache, is worshipped as Venkatakrishnan. This two-armed deity holds the conch (Sankha) but the discus (Chakra) is not seen which is rather rare in a Vishnu image. This is because Krishna did not use weapons in this war. Inside this sanctum are five more deities namely goddess Rukmini, Krishna’s consort; Sankarshana (Balarama), Pradyumna (Krishna’s son), Aniruddha (Krishna’s grandson) and Satyaki (also called Yuyudhana, a warrior and Krishna’s friend)[5]. Yoga Narasimha, facing west, is also a main deity with a flag-post (dvajastambha) in front, just like Venkatakrishnan[6].

Satyaki in the Literature: Yuyudhana (युयुधान), better known as Satyaki (सात्यकि), was a powerful Yadava chieftain of Narayani Sena, belonging to the Vrishni clan to which Krishna also belonged. According to the Puranas, he was the grandson of Shini of the Vrishni clan, and son of Satyaka, after whom he was named. A valiant warrior, Satyaki was devoted to Krishna and was a student of Arjuna. Satyaki strongly and passionately favors the cause of the Pandavas over the Kauravas in the Kurukshetra War. Prior to the war, Satyaki accompanied Krishna to the Kuru capital, with Krishna as the Pandavas’ emissary of peace. He is a witness to Duryodhana’s attempt to arrest Krishna and Krishna’s Vishwaroopa form, though he is not mentioned as one of the few persons not blinded by the apparition. After talks break down, Satyaki leads the Sivi and Vrishni army to the Pandava’s camp. While Satyaki, along with others like Chekitana and Syenajita joins the Pandavas, Krishna promises his army to Duryodhana. Hence, Yadavas sworn directly to Dwarka like Kritvarma fight for the Kauravas, meaning Satyaki has to fight his kinsmen in the war. He provides 1 Akshauhini army to the Pandavas. During the war, Satyaki is the commander of one akshauhini of the Pandava army. According to Bhishma, he is capable of fighting 12 Atirathis alone. After the Kurukshetra war, Gandhari curses Krishna that his clan will be destroyed 36 years later in a fratricidal massacre. Accordingly, the Dwaraka clans fought with each other and killed themselves.

There is a sculpture suggesting how Satyaki protected the Pandavas, when Aswathama wanted to kill the Pandavas by sleeping at the camp of the enemies…

R.K.K. Rajarajan’s “Rare Forms of Gaṇapati”[7]: Next, Dr. R.K.K. Rajarajan  Assistant Professor in Fine Arts, Gandhigram Rural University delved upon, “Rare Forms of Gaṇapati – With Reference to Notes in Tamil ‘Bhakti’ Literature.” Mainly, he relied upon the Tamils of Tamilnadu of even recent day manipulations and tried to show how Ganapati had attracted the Tamilnadu sculptors to accommodate different form in the gopurams, side-wall depictions and wooden chariots / rathas. Treating the origin of “Pillaiyar” (whose child), he brought it under two streams  northern Sanskritic and Southern Tamil. He relies upon Asko Parpola for pointing out that the name Pillaiyar finds its root in the Central Dravidian languages of the Proto-Dravidian family. With later day and recent sculptures, he links Ganapati with Vyasa, Parasurama[8], Vygapada etc., obviously with chronological itch. Moreover, these stories were spun just 100-200 years back and have been lesser than mythologies. In newly constructed temples, the modern sculptures go on add such sculptures, just for present popularity or as per the wishes of some devotees. The illustrative sculptures taken have to be given their dates to compare such depictions are available in the Sanskrit or Tamil literature. When Upanishad mentions about the roots of Ganapati, then, antiquity has to be decided accordingly.

Technical Paper reading session: After lunch, the paper reading session started with the paper reading proceedings. The first technical session was headed by Prof. Choodamani Nandagopal, Art historian, UNESCO Fellow and Tagore National Fellow, Bengaluru. For presentation of papers, 15 minutes time was given. The following papers were presented:

1. Dr. J. Soundararajan  & Mr. K. V. Ramakrishna Rao  – “The precept, concept and evolution of “Minor Deities” in India”
2. Mrs. R. Ramya[9] – “Devmogra – Goddess of worship for Satpuda Tribal people”
3. Dr. Amrita Chakraborty – “Dikpālas: Eastern Indian Variations”
4. Dr. Ramadevi Sekhar[10]  – “Guardian of the Skies: Garuda’s Multifaceted Presence in Texts and Practices”

The Technical Session – II was held at the Main Hall in Parallel chaired by Dr. Chitra Madhavan, Historian and Writer, Chennai and the following papers were presented:

1. Mr. K. Sridharan[11]  – “Annapurani and Annamurti in Art and Temple Rituals”
2. Dr. Parthiban Rajukalidoss[12]  – “Lord of five houses in the hamlet of ten scarlet ixora: syncretism of a folk deity and its temple in Ceṭṭiyapattu, Uṭaṉkuṭi”
3. Dr. S.P. Prem Singh Muthubalan – “Mythology of Isakki Amman Worship in Southern Tamilnadu”
4. Dr. P.C. Muralidharan  – “Worship of deities Garuḍa and Sudarśana as enunciated in Śeṣasamhitā”

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

30-03-2024.

---

[1]  About the Institute- https://cprfoundation.org/CPRIIR pamphlet-2023.pdf

[2]  About the Journal – https://cprfoundation.org/CPRIIR.html

[3] Journal of Indian History and Culture (JIHC)

• Listed in UGC – CARE (ISSN: 0975-7805) –https://cprfoundation.org/modify_new2022.png ; https://journalcpriir.com/previous-issues/

[4] Abstracts, sl.no.1; p.7.

[5] Indian Express, A Vishnu temple, unique in more ways than one, Chithra Madhavan,Updated on: 08 Feb 2017, 11:15 am.

[6] https://www.newindianexpress.com/chennai/2017/Feb/07/a-vishnu-temple-unique-in-more-ways-than-one-1568080.html

[7]  Abstracts, sl.no.6; pp.14-15

[8]  Reportedly Brahmanda Purana, it is evident that this myth resembles, Dhakshayini / Parvati story and thence, created later period, may be during medieval peiod,

[9] Abstracts, sl.no. 24; p.41

[10] Abstracts, sl.no. 23; p.39

[11] Abstracts, sl.no. 28; p.45.

[12] Abstracts, sl.no. 20; p.36.

The National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities (NMMA) – workshop at Chennai from October 31st to November 2nd 2023 (4)

The National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities  (NMMA) – workshop at Chennai from October 31^st to November 2^nd 2023 (4)

The CAG Report and the response of the ASI: On 02-11-2023, after lunch Dr Charuta Kulkarni, IIT, Madras talked about her subject, as detailed above. Then, the certificates were distributed to the participants and mementoes were given to some. Now, I discuss about some issues involved in the documentation of monuments and antiquities. As I worked in the GST (formerly Customs, Central Excise, Narcotics – indirect taxation) department, mostly in the Judicial, adjudication and legal sections for more than 38 years from 1980 to 2018, the CAG Reports on the various departments, institutions and others were periodically read, along with the judgments. Here, before coming to the workshop, I have read the Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India Follow-up on the Performance Audit of Preservation and Conservation of Monuments and Antiquities. The issues related to the documentation, workshop conducted etc., were pointed out therein.

The NMMA caught in the web of politics: The National Monuments Authority (NMA) has released draft heritage bye-laws for the supposed site of the Palace of Asoka in Patna, Bihar. The site, located in the Kumrahar area, is being protected by the Archaeological Survey of India. The draft bye-laws aim to conserve and develop the site and have been released based on a field survey conducted by the competent authority. The NMA is responsible for the protection and preservation of monuments and sites, as well as granting permissions for construction-related activities in the prohibited and regulated areas. The Congress party has accused the Modi government of attempting to weaken a law that protects monuments and archaeological sites in India. Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh praised the National Monuments Authority (NMA) for releasing draft heritage bylaws for the conservation and development of protected monuments in Bihar. Ramesh stated that the Congress and other parties have successfully resisted the government’s attempts to weaken the law so far. He also emphasized the need to strengthen and maintain the professional character of the NMA.

2015 to 2022 no workshop conducted: The CAG pointed out that, “Since March 2015, no workshop was held to facilitate documentation work, rectify mistakes or to provide clarification to agencies involved in the process. As a result, there was absence of a system for regularly up-grading the technical capability of executing agencies, which affected the work process.”

The documentation process carried on by NMMA: The CAG  pointed out the lacunae in the documentation of the monuments[1].

NMMA has given these figures to the CAG.

Issue of “Non-antiquity” certificates by the ASI: ASI (respective circle) issues a certificate of non-antiquity for the exportof art-objects, arms. Here, who issues such certificate, after analyzing the “non-antiquity” nature of te object. Otherwise, millions of Indian antiquities would not have been illegally exported out 0f India after 1947 or 1976.

2. To facilitate Custom Authorities in allowing non-antiquities to be exported, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has established Expert Advisory Committees to issue non-antiquity certificates.

India’s rich cultural heritage, bureaucratic apathy and poor implementation of antiquities protection law has made India a fertile ground for loot and smuggling of antiquities for sale in the International market. In recent years, there has been growing concerns over antiques being smuggled and sold to fund terrorists’ activists.

According to the Antiquities (Export Control) Act, 1947 [Act No. 31 of 1947]  – “antiquity” includes-

(i) any coin, sculpture, manuscript, epigraph, or other work of art or craftsmanship,

(ii) any article, object or thing detached from a building or cave,

(iii) any article, object or thing illustrative of science, art, craft literature, religion, customs, morals or politics in bygone ages,

(iv) any article, object or thing declared by the Central Government by notification in the Official Gazette to be an antiquity for the purposes of this Act,

Provenance (origin, attribution, derivation) includes the list of all owners from the time the object left its maker’s possession to the time it was acquired by the current owner. However, here in the workshop, it is taken as “Province”!

Most of the exports of antiquities take place from north India from airports: According to Section 2(1) (a) of the Antiquities and Art Treasurers Act, an antique is defined as an article or object of historical interest that has been in existence for not less than one hundred years.

The import and export of antiques is covered by the prohibition imposed under Section 11 (c) of the Customs Act 1962, specifically referred to as The Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972.

Similarly, exports are also under the prohibition category. The export of antiques can only be done by the central government or any authority or agency authorised by the central government.

 The law does not permit any private person to export antiques. If any private person exports antiques, there are penal provisions to confiscate the material and impose monetary penalties or prosecute the person.

Port	Location	Value (INR Million)
Pakwra	Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh	34..567
Kolkotta Air cargo	West Bengal	27.151
Nhava Sheva sea[2]	Raigad district, Maharashtra	20.475
Mundra[3]	Gulf of Kutch near Mundra, Kutch district, Gujarat.	11.141
Chennai sea	Tamilnadu	7.381

The ASI blaming the Customs department: When Arun Raj said that the Customs department was not co-operating, I pointed out that it is not that the Customs department did not cooperate with the ASI officials, but, the ASI officers only many times did not turn up, when they were requested to come and identify the objects of antiquity were seized at the airports. Moreover, they have to go by the certificates issued by the ASI only and in many cases, the Customs officers could get genuine doubt that older antiquities were taken out of India, instead of recent artefacts. Sreelakshmi responded that the ASI officers were asked to verify the import of Indian artefacts. Then, I clarified that it was different, because, the art-smugglers had been adopting a modus operandi, as if such antiquities were imported legally so that they could again export. That is why they sought the help of the ASI for the identification of the objects[4].  There have been several reports urging the ASI to co-ordinate with the RI, Customs etc., but, they are not doing so[5]. As the certificates issued by the ASI are / have to be relied upon and whenever, the Customs officers have any doubt about the object for antiquity, they used to seek the help of the ASI officers, but, they hesitate to come.  The famous VJA Flynn case also pointed out by me[6]. Here, VJA Flynn had contacts with many historians and archaeologists, but, caught red-handed in smuggling artefacts out of India[7].

The illegal import and export of Tipu Sultan’s sword: The classic case of Vijay Mallya in 2005, imported Tipu Sultan’s famed sword to India and exported it without any license[8]. Mallya was served a show cause notice by the Customs Department for exporting without informing the government, and not paying the duty for it[9]. However, the tycoon felt that since the sword was a matter of national pride, he should have been exempted. Thus, the provisions of the Antiquities and Art Treasure Act, 1972, have been amended to do away with several lacunae in the Act, commonly recognised as the Customs Act. As per the Act, any private buyer that buys an antiquity of Indian origin and brings it to India must first acquire a license. This is granted on the basis of several factors, including the experience of the person in the art trade, the place of exchange of the art object, the name and the number of people involved, etc. Domestic trade of antiquities is currently unregulated, as the Act is silent on it. The statutory authority of the Act is usually the Director General of the ASI, who decides what an antiquity or art treasure is. As per Section 2 of the Act, any coin, sculpture, painting, epigraph, artwork, object from a building or cave and object of historical interest that is over one hundred years old, is defined as an antiquity. In circle offices of the ASI around the country, where the DG is usually not present, the Act cannot be implemented by any officer below the position of a director. “Yet, several circle officers have been flouting the rule, declaring several antiquities as invalid leading to the thriving of the smuggling of art objects,” said the official.

All departments of GOI should work together: The CAG has been part of the GOI and all other departments also have been parts of GOI. The CAG has been auditing the accounts of different departments and trying to advise to implement the Act and Rules under which they work. All have been working with the Public Finance and the government is responsible to account for every rupee that collected from the citizens. As our country has been handling more than 100 crores population, now 140 crores, we have more responsibility than other countries with less population. Moreover, our government and democratic polity have been so open that everybody can appreciate and criticize also, unlike other countries. Thus, the ASI has been having the most noble duty, virtuous responsibility and righteous accountability in handling thousands of years of monuments and temples; sculptures and coins; palaces and buildings; ghats, and others. It can invite the officers of the other departments for discussion to sort out the practical problems. After all should work for the progress and development of our country creating awareness about culture, tradition, heritage and civilization.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

05-11-2023

---

[1] Report No. 10 of 2022; https://cag.gov.in/uploads/download_audit_report/2022/Chapter 6-062f0de36c49e05.39285992.pdf

[2] Jawaharlal Nehru Port, also known as JNPT and Nhava Sheva Port, is the second largest container port in India after Mundra Port. Operated by the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust Authority (JNPTA), it is located on the eastern shores of Arabian Sea in Navi Mumbai, Raigad district, Maharashtra.

[3] Mundra Port is India’s first private port (adani) and largest container port, located on the northern shores of the Gulf of Kutch near Mundra, Kutch district, Gujarat.

[4] Press Release dated 24-07-2023, Three Hundred Forty Eighth Report on the subject „Heritage Theft – The Illegal Trade in Indian Antiquities and the Challenges of Retrieving and Safeguarding Our Tangible Cultural Heritage,” Sansad News.

[5]https://sansad.in/getFile/rsnew/Committee_site/Committee_File/Press_ReleaseFile/20/173/656P_2023_7_12.pdf?source=rajyasabha

[6] K. V. Ramakrishna Rao, Historians involved in smuggling also – The historical case of Prof. V.J.A. Flynn, a friend of many Indian historians – arrested for smuggling, jailed and deported to Australia for further proceedings!, February 17, 2022.

[7] https://kvramakrishnarao.wordpress.com/2022/02/17/the-historical-case-of-prof-v-j-a-flynn-a-friend-of-many-indian-historians-arrested-for-smuggling-jailed-and-deported-to-australia-for-further-proceedings/

[8] DNA India, ASI for easier norms for private import of antiquities, Amrita Madhukalya, Updated: Nov 02, 2016, 07:05 PM IST.

[9] https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-asi-for-easier-norms-for-private-import-of-antiquities-2269587

The National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities (NMMA) – workshop at Chennai from October 31st to November 2nd 2023 (2)

The National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities  (NMMA) – workshop at Chennai from October 31^st to November 2^nd 2023 (2)

On the second day, Dr K. Amarnath Ramakrishna, Prof. P P Joglekar and Prof. Shanti Pappu discussed about very important issues of documentation of the temples, antiquities of different materials and lithic tools. The practical difficulties in maintaining them, classifying and documenting them also were discussed. The creation of database in each and every category and converting them for public utility has been an important task. India with vast areas and monuments situated at remote places that too, without any safety and security, it has been very difficult to maintain them. Unfortunately, the ASI does not have any protecting system for the remote monuments. In fact, tourists themselves have difficulties in reaching such remote places. These circumstances only help the art-thieves, icon-looters and sculptures lifters to carry on the work continuously.

K. Amarnath Ramakrishna: Architectural Survey Projects include the Temple Survey Projects (North and South) and Building Survey Project. The main functions are:

• Survey and documentation of temples of various periods and in different parts of the country, research based on the field survey, preparation of reports on the survey;
• Survey and documentation of all secular architecture and colonial buildings, research on the survey and preparation of reports;
• Interaction with various universities and research institutions.

He explained about the temples coming under the control of ASI and explained how they have documented them. However, they do not work with the HR & CE to quantify all temples in Tamilnadu.

The quantification of the temples in Tamilnadu: This is a list of temples in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu which is famed for Tamil architecture styled Hindu temples, culture and tradition and is commonly known as the Land of Temples. Tamil Nadu has more temples than any other states of India. Tamil Nadu is home to more than 46,000 Hindu temples and is aptly called “the land of temples” by the media. Many are at least 800 years old and are found scattered all over the state. The rulers of various dynasties constructed these temples over centuries. Vimanas (storeys) and Gopuram (towering gateways to the temple complex) best characterize the temples of Tamil Nadu. As per Tamil Nadu Hindu Endowments Board, there are 39,615 / 38,615 temples[1]. Most of the largest Hindu temples reside here. Studded with complex architecture, variety of sculptures, and rich inscriptions, the temples remain the very essence of the culture and heritage of Tamil land, with historical records dating back to at least 3,000 years.

Temple maintenance, conservation and preservation: Many regular and committed pilgrims, bloggers and writers have been pointing out as to how even the Chola period temples with inscriptions have been crumbling down, but, ASI or even TN State Department archaeology does not bother. However, some local serious devotees, Uzhavarappani[2] groups (Voluntary Temple Cleaning groups) and others have been doing wonderful work for the last more than 50 years.

P Pramod Joglekar: Explaining “New Archaeology,” he went on to point out how statistical methods are used in archaeology to understand facts. E explained the three stages in such development before 1960, 1960 to 1974 and 1974 thereafter. The quantitative approach could be specifically deal with the issues by subjecting the data in different forms. The qualitative method has been subjective and thus individual, biased, one-sided, skewed and differs much from the interpretations. The qualitative method, on the other hand, has been objective – specific, unbiased and independent. Quantitative information is measurable or countable data that can provide insight into research questions. Quantitative information is one of the most direct ways to understand limited, specific questions, such as how often people in a culture perform a certain action or how many times an art form or motif appears in a cultural artifact. Statistics created from quantitative data help researchers understand trends and changes over time. In cultural research, qualitative data allows anthropologists to understand culture based on more subjective analyses of language, behaviour, ritual, symbolism, and the interrelationships of people. Qualitative data has the potential for more in-depth responses via open-ended questions, which can be coded and categorized in order to better identify common themes.

Quantitative analysis with few examples: Qualitative analysis is less about frequency and the number of things and more about a researcher’s subjective insights and understandings. Anthropology and other fields in the social sciences frequently integrate both types of data by using mixed methods. Through the triangulation of data, anthropologists can use both objective and frequency data (for example, survey results) and subjective data (such as observations) to provide a more holistic understanding. Thus, with graphs, he explained the usage of bangles by women. Showing two different occasions, the usage of shell bangles rises and falls. Different interpretations are given as the wrist size of the women changes and thus the size of the shell bangles also change; instead of shell, some other material was used and thus the rise and fall; thus the interpretations also increase. But, at a particular place, the usage had to be definite and also the explanation. Similarly, in another graph with three peaks, the usage of animals was interpreted with the bones found. Thus, it is interpreted that the hunter-gatherers were using meat at here different periods and such usage rose and fell, obviously resorted to other type of food; thus, they might have resorted to agriculture; or they might have domesticated them for some other use and killed; and so on. Any way all such interpretations have been amazing, interesting and intriguing also.

Shanti Pappu: Different types of lithic tools were distributed to the participants and asked to study them carefully and opine the type and nature of them. Thus, each participant came out with his opinion exhibiting the practical difficulty in identifying, classifying and documenting the lithic tools. In fact, whether they can be called as “artefacts” to be classified under the Acts and Rules and antiquities. Yet, she has been discussing with the ASI officials and trying to classify. Luminescence dating at the stratified prehistoric site of Attirampakkam, India, has shown that processes signifying the end of the Acheulian culture and the emergence of a Middle Palaeolithic culture occurred at 385 ± 64 thousand years ago (ka), much earlier than conventionally presumed for South Asia. The Middle Palaeolithic continued at Attirampakkam until 172 ± 41 ka. Chronologies of Middle Palaeolithic technologies in regions distant from Africa and Europe are crucial for testing theories about the origins and early evolution of these cultures, and for understanding their association with modern humans or archaic hominins, their links with preceding Acheulian cultures and the spread of Levallois lithic technologies.

About the Paleolithic tools: The geographic location of India and its rich Middle Palaeolithic record are ideally suited to addressing these issues, but progress has been limited by the paucity of excavated sites and hominin fossils as well as by geochronological constraints. At Attirampakkam, the gradual disuse of bifaces, the predominance of small tools, the appearance of distinctive and diverse Levallois flake and point strategies, and the blade component all highlight a notable shift away from the preceding Acheulian large-flake technologies. These findings document a process of substantial behavioural change that occurred in India at 385 ± 64 ka and establish its contemporaneity with similar processes recorded in Africa and Europe. This suggests complex interactions between local developments and ongoing global transformations. Together, these observations call for a re-evaluation of models that restrict the origins of Indian Middle Palaeolithic culture to the incidence of modern human dispersals after approximately 125 ka.

Opinion of other scholars: Considerable numbers of artefacts can be documented with high accuracy and resolution when the methods described are used[3]. Virtual artefact collections can be documented completely, even if the artefacts are stored at different places, including objects that were considered as being unretouched pieces[4]. The virtual collection thus achieved can be distributed easily on storage media such as CD ROMs or even through the Internet. It can be examined by anybody and compared to any real or virtual artefacts of similar origin. All visualization products are results of automatic and objective procedures, thus avoiding the individual subjective interpretation which is inevitably part of hand-drawn figures.

The points observed: The NMMA form was given with antique objects to all and asked to fill up with their observations in their format.  Digital weighing machine, Vernier calipers, scale, magnifying glass etc., were also provided to analyze the object given. The session went on till lunch and thereafter. Then, “how to take photographs of the artefacts,” was also demonstrated and explained.

• No consensus about the form used for documentation of the artefacts, monuments and others to be recorded.
• How to classify the palaeolithic tools as “antique” under the Act or to be classified so!
• What are lithic tools and cores, difference, how are they identified, classified and documented?
• The Paleolithic site – not exactly the lithic tools collected as they were “taken since 1950 and none determine exactly,, from where they had taken.”
• Whether excavated, at wht level or simply they came there, rummaged the excavated sites and taken such lithic tools?
• The Paleolithic chronology does not tally with the sedimentary formation at the same place or nearby place.
• To get such lithic tools at one foot, 3 feet etc., from the present ground level and decide them accordingly…
• All lithic tools are not “artefacts” unless, some human work could be seen / noted / or at least identified on the surface of the object.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

04-11-2023

---

[1] The HR & CE of the TN government figure – available from their website. The temples not coming under the HR & CE are also to be added with this figure.

[2] One of the Nayanmar, Thirunavukkarasar / Appar used to visit all temples and clean with his “Uzhavarappadai” (small spade) and thus,the expression symbolically denotes such tool and the voluntary service rendered by devotee in temples periodically.

[3] Boehler, W., Boehm, K., Heinz, G., Justus, A., Schwarz, C., & Siebold, M. (2003, September). Documentation of stone age artifacts. In Proceedings of the XIX th CIPA Symposium. ISPRS/CIPA (pp. 506-510).

[4] https://www.cipaheritagedocumentation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Boehler-e.a.-Documentation-of-Stone-Age-artifacts.pdf

The National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities (NMMA) – workshop at Chennai from October 31st to November 2nd 2023 (1)

The National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities  (NMMA) – workshop at Chennai from October 31^st to November 2^nd 2023 (1)

NMMA workshop first day programme 31-10-2023

National Database of all Monuments and Antiquities: With the objective of preparing a national database of all monuments and antiquities, the National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities (NMMA) was launched by the Government 36 (2007), initially for a period of five years i.e. 2007-2012. In order to complete the documentation process and continue the momentum, this period was extended by another five years (2012-2017) and later NMMA was merged with ASI (October 2017). Delay in setting up of NMMA and lack of planning leading to failure in achieving its objective was pointed out in the previous CAG Report.

Lighting lamp to inaugurate the workshop….

Objectives of NMMA: The National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities was launched in 2007. The time frame prescribed for its completion is five years. Documentation and creation of suitable database on built heritage and sites through published and unpublished secondary sources for information and dissemination to planners, researchers, etc. and for better management of such cultural resources. Documentation in a uniform developed by NMMA, of all Antiquities that are available in different formats in the form of Registered Antiquities, Catalogued Antiquities with Central as well as State Governments, Private museums and Collections, Universities, etc. Promote awareness and sensitize people concerning the benefits of preserving the historical and cultural aspects of built heritage, sites and antiquities. Extend training facility and capacity building to the concerned State Departments, Local bodies, NGOs, Universities, Museums, Local communities etc. Help in developing synergy between institutions Archaeological Survey of India, State Departments, concerned Institutions and NGOs to generate close interaction.

• Publication and Research.
• Expected output
• National Register on Built Heritage & Sites
• National Register on Antiquities.

Lighting lamp..

2022 onwards workshops conducted: The NMMA has been conducting workshops on the documentation from 2022 onwards[1] – November 2022 – Greater Noida; December – Guwahati; December – Aurangabad; 2023 January – Bhopal; 2023 January – Bangalore; 2023 February – Bhubaneswar; Why conduct workshops suddenly? As I am familiar with CAG audit, audit reports etc., and reading them carefully, I noted in the 2022-CAG Report[2] that, “It also stated that there was a need for reviewing the existing documentation process/guidelines, identify and revive Documentation Resource Centres (DRC)/State Level Implementing Committees (SLIC), initiate training programmes and workshops at the local levels. …….Since March 2015, no workshop was held to facilitate documentation work, rectify mistakes or to provide clarification to agencies involved in the process. As a result, there was absence of a system for regularly up-grading the technical capability of executing agencies, which affected the work process.”

NMMA workshop= audience view RHS

Three-day workshop at Chennai: A three-day workshop on “documentation of monuments” was held at Keys Select by Lemon Tree Hotels, Katti-Ma, Chennai, Kalakshetra Road, Thiruvanmiyur, organized by NMMA and ASI (Chennai circle) from October 31st to November 2nd 2023. It was inaugurated by  Prof Kishore Kumar Basa DG of ASI by lamping lamp and the proceedings continued with the speeches of Ravikorisettar, Sathyabhama and Samanta. Then, there was a practical session to identify the artefacts, measure their physical dimensions and note them down in the format for documentation. This was followed by photography practice, in which, how to take a photograph of an artefact was demonstrated.

Documenting of antiques will prevent their smuggling to other countries, said Archaeological Survey of India’s National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities director Madhulika Samanta on Tuesday [31-10-2023][3]. “A large number of antiques are getting smuggled out of the country. We do not have any knowledge that they were with us till they are showing up in museums in Europe and America,” she said[4]. She was speaking on the sidelines of a regional workshop cum training programme here on the documentation of monuments and antiques (southern region). “When we initiate legal proceedings to bring them back, we end up losing cases in international courts as we do not have any national data to show that they were with us,” Samanta said.

• The national mission had a target of documentation
• ASI’s NMMA has documented 17 lakh antiques and 58 lakh antiques and four lakh built heritage sites. , and 1.84 lakh heritage sites.
• “But we have published only 11,000 sites so far because the data was collected from secondary sources, including research articles, reports,” she added.

She said unprotected monuments are also getting demolished due to developmental activities. “If universities, state archaeological departments, colleges, organisations come up with project proposals to document antiques, we will recognise them as documentation resource centres and give them grants,” she said.

In India, it is a problem of plenty: “Heritage is our strength. If not managed well it could be a liability,” ASI director general Kishore K Basa[5] said while speaking at the inaugural function[6] pointing out, as for as the antiquities and monuments are concerned, it is a problem of plenty. However, it has to be accepted as positive manner in presenting them. There is a difference between the attitude and approach of the people towards the monuments by the colonial period and till 21st century. During the colonial period, the natives were kept away from te exploration, excavation and heritage management. But, now the citizens have to be taken into account in heritage management. ASI has to work with citizen-centric approach, as money comes from the public. He emphasised the necessity of the documentation of all the monuments, artefacts and others[7]. In the documentation processes, multilayered information should be provided and even children should be made to take an interest in heritage management.

Who is responsible for the illegal trafficking of the artefacts?: Sathyabhama Badrinath talked about, “Objectives of NMMA and future course of action,” tracing the creation of NMMA somewhere in 2006-2007 period under the Five years plan and then extended to 2011-2012. On 01-10-2017, it was merged with the ASI. With te urbanization and looting of antiquities, the monuments started disappearing. Illicit trafficking has been taking place. There have been 4 lakh heritage sites, 3  lakhs of the ASI and one that of Built-heritage categories. The Customs and Postal Department have seized many artefacts, but they are lying and the condition is not known. Thus, she tried to blame the other departments. The private collectors should register with the ASI. It appears that the ASI is interested in adding more numbers in their NMMA register.

Prehistory artefacts, ulture, terminology etc. – to follow European o African model?: Ravikorisettar talked about, “Documentation of Antiquities Chennai circle, Southern region – from documentation perspective.” He explained about the exploration, excavation and recovery of the prehistoric artefacts from different sites of South India. He also listed out the sites according to their location, geographical and geological importance and the nature of artefacts recovered. He also pointed out as to how these sites have been getting affected by quarrying, infrastructure development and climatic conditions.As he has been an expert in the prehistory, he covered most of his findings with slides for about one hour and then come to the issue of documentation, classifying / grouping such prehistoric / paleolithic sites. He pointed out how the lithic objects, cultures and related issues were / are mentioned with different terminology. The European model / terminology is not applicable to India. Thus, Africal example are followed and expression like  “Madrassian complex” is also used. Coming to the upper Paleolithic, it is not known to identify them as European or African model?

Madhulika Samanta – vote of thanks: The Archaeological Survey of India’s National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities (NMMA) director, Madhulika Samanta, has emphasized the importance of documenting antiquities to prevent their smuggling out of the country. Samanta stated that India often loses legal cases in international courts because there is no national data to prove that the smuggled antiquities were originally in India. The NMMA has documented 17 lakh antiquities and 1.84 lakh-built heritage sites so far, but the data published on their website is limited as it is collected from secondary sources. Samanta also highlighted the need to protect monuments from demolition due to development activities.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

03-11-2023

---

[1] http://nmma.nic.in/nmma/workshop.do

[2] Report No. 10 of 2022; https://cag.gov.in/uploads/download_audit_report/2022/Chapter 6-062f0de36c49e05.39285992.pdf

[3] Times of India, Director of ASI’s NMMA suggests a way to prevent smuggling of antiquities, A Ragu Raman / TNN / Oct 31, 2023, 19:26 IST

[4] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/director-of-asis-nmma-suggests-a-way-to-prevent-smuggling-of-antiquities/articleshow/104860696.cms

[5] Prof. Kishor K. Basa,  Utkal University Professor (Retired on 31.03.2018), Ph. D. (London); Phone No.: 8895615636; E-mail ID: kishorkbasa58@gmail.com

[6] Times of India, Documenting of antiques will curb smuggling: ASI’s NMMA director, TNN / Nov 1, 2023, 08:17 IST

[7] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/documenting-of-antiques-will-curb-smuggling-asis-nmma-director/articleshow/104872987.cms

Buddha statue, Sanskrit inscription, Satavahana coins found at a temple in the city of Berenike on the Red Sea coast!

Buddha statue, Sanskrit inscription, Satavahana coins found at a temple in the city of Berenike on the Red Sea coast!

Buddha statue found inside a temple on 26-04-2023: A statue of the Buddha dating from the Roman era has been found in the city of Berenike on the Red Sea coast by the joint Polish-American archaeological mission operating during its excavation work in the city’s ancient temple on Wednesday 26-04-2023[1]. Actually, it was found in broken condition and all the parts put together appeared perfect statue made of marble[2]. The archaeological mission has been working at the site since 1994 under the council’s supervision. Berenice Troglodytica, also called Berenike or Baranis, is an ancient seaport of Egypt on the western shore of the Red Sea[3]. It is situated about 825 km south of Suez, 260 km east of Aswan in Upper Egypt and 140 km south of Marsa Alam[4]. Berenike, 140 kilometers south of Marsa Alam, was founded in 275 B.CE. by Egyptian King Ptolemy II (283 to 246 B.C.) who named it after his mother[5].

Important evidence of trade links between Egypt and India during the Roman era: According to Dr. Mostafa Waziri, Secretary General of the Supreme Council of Antiquities, the mission has been working at the site since 1994 under the supervision of the Supreme Council of Antiquities, and during the current season it brought to light important evidence of trade links between Egypt and India during the Roman era[6]. At that time Egypt was located in the center of the trade route that connected the Roman Empire to many parts of the ancient world, including India[7]. Berenike was the most important among the many Red Sea where ships arrived from India laden with products such as pepper, semi-precious stones, textiles and ivory, which were then loaded to camels in order to be transported to the Nile Valley across the desert, and finally on other ships in order to reach Alexandria and, from there, the rest of the Roman Empire[8].

The Indian goods with ships were reaching the East African ports: it is well-known that the Indian goods were in demand for the ancient Egyptian and other civilizations and the Indian ships with loaded goods were reaching all the ports of Eastern Africa, passing through the Red Sea and selling their products. Cotton cloth and spices were always in demand in those countries. The monsoon winds were exploited turning to “trade winds” and thus, hundreds of Indian ships were going to those ports and returning with required goods and gold. Thus, India was becoming more and more wealthy and engaged in producing more goods. As more and more Indian traders, sailors and maritime workers were going out ad they had to stay months and years, their settlements were there with houses and temples. With the passage of time, all these structures disappeared and were buried under the earth. The buried ones are only now discovered through archaeological excavations.

The details of Buddha discovered now on 26-04-2023: Dr. Mariusz Gwiazda, head of the mission from the Polish side, talked about the Buddha statue[9]. He said that it was made of stone quarried either from an area south of Istanbul or locally in Berenike and was dedicated to the temple by one or more wealthy merchants from India[10]. Thus, the movement of Indian goods, ships and people from India to these places and return is proven again. The height of the statue is 71 cm. It depicts the Buddha standing and carrying part of his clothes in his left hand. There is also a halo around his head with the rays of the sun depicted on it, which indicates his radiant mind. There is also a lotus flower next to him. This discovery can be compared with that of the Ivory statue of Lakshmi found at Pompeii in the excavation, because, Indian merchants must have passed through Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea to reach the Roman Empire in those days.

The Pompeii Lakshmi is an ivory statuette the Naples museum: The Pompeii Lakshmi is an ivory statuette that was discovered in the ruins of Pompeii, a Roman city destroyed in the eruption of Mount Vesuvius 79 CE. It was found by Amedeo Maiuri, an Italian scholar, in 1938. The statuette has been dated to the first century CE. The statuette is thought of as representing an Indian goddess of feminine beauty and fertility. It is possible that the sculpture originally formed the handle of a mirror. The yakshi is evidence of commercial trade between India and Rome in the first century CE. Originally, it was thought that the statuette represented the goddess Lakshmi, a goddess of fertility, beauty and wealth, revered by early Hindus, Buddhists and Jains. However, the iconography, in particular the exposed genitals, reveals that the figure is more likely to depict a yakshi, a female tree spirit that represents fertility, or possibly a syncretic version of Venus-Sri-Lakshmi from an ancient exchange between Classical Greco-Roman and Indian cultures. The figure is now in the Secret Museum in the Naples National Archaeological Museum.

Sanskrit inscription and Satavahana coins found: Dr. Stephen Sidbotham, head of the mission from the American side, pointed out that during its work in the temple, the mission also uncovered an inscription in Sanskrit dating back to the Roman Emperor Philip the Arab (Marcus Julius Philippus) (244-249 CE). It seems that this inscription is not of the same date as the statue, which is probably much older, as in the temple there were other inscriptions, in Greek, which date back to the early first century CE. Finally, two 2^nd c.CE coins of the central Indian Satavahana Dynasty are among the finds. The city was one of the key transit points for long-distance trade between the Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean and during the Roman era developed into a prosperous center. Human remains and other artefacts found earlier by Sidebotham’s team showed that Berenike was inhabited by people of all ages and backgrounds.

How and why the maritime trade methodology changed?: During the first centuries, as more and more non-Indian groups had started coming to India by land and ocean-sea route, certain changes also started taking place.

• Considering the demand for the goods, the Indians might have stopped their taking goods across the oceans and seas to sell them.
• Thereby they could reduce their overheads and thus, made the non-Indians to come to India, pay and take the goods.
• Thus, the Romans, Greeks and Persians were always placed at the receiving end.
• The Persians, Greeks and Romans had to apply aggressive methods against India, as could be noted from their literature that  they invaded India, conquered India and so on.
• Of course, slowly, Indians could have lost their territories, after Mahabhart 3101 BCE, as could be noted that the Indian Khatrias scattered, spread in the western direction mixing with others and disappearing, as they slowly lost their identity.
• The piracy could have forced Indians to adopt better and safety method of making non-Indians to come to their ports and trade.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

29-04-2023

---

[1] Archeology.Wiki, Buddha statue found at Berenike on the Red Sea Coast Βy the joint Polish-American archaeological mission, 27 Apr 2023, by Archaeology, Newsroom 

[2]   https://www.archaeology.wiki/blog/2023/04/27/buddha-statue-found-at-berenike-on-the-red-sea-coast/

[3] Arab News, 2nd-century statue of Buddha found in ancient Egyptian seaport, Updated 27 April 2023, GOBRAN MOHAMED, April 27, 2023 22:12

[4] https://www.arabnews.com/node/2294041/middle-east

[5] Egypt Today, A marble statue of Buddha was uncovered in Berenike at the Red Sea, BY Egypt Today staff, Fri, 28 Apr 2023 – 11:44 GMT

[6] https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/4/124027/A-marble-statue-of-Buddha-was-uncovered-in-Berenike-at

[7] Greek Reporter, Ancient Statue of Buddha Found in Egypt Suggests Links with India, By Alexander Gale, April 28, 2023.

[8] https://greekreporter.com/2023/04/28/ancient-statue-buddha-egypt/

[9] Egypt Museum, Statue of Buddha unearthed at temple in Berenice, April 28, 2023.

[10] https://egypt-museum.com/statue-of-buddha-unearthed-at-temple-in-berenice/