The National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities  (NMMA) – workshop at Chennai from October 31st to November 2nd 2023 (3)

The National Mission on Monuments and Antiquities  (NMMA) – workshop at Chennai from October 31st to November 2nd 2023 (3)

The third day proceedings of the NMMA Workshop for the Southern Region: The following speakers delved upon their respective topics and specialized areas. Though, the topic has been documentation of the objects, the speakers mostly discussed about their findings with their valuable experience with important points.

  • Prof. Deivanayagam, Tamil University , Thanjavur
  • Shri Nishant Zodape and Shri Yash Gupta, on utilisation of open-source software for creating databases,
  • Dr. Muthu Shankar, Head of GIS Applications, French Institute, Pondicherry ,
  • Dr Arun Raj.T on strategies for stopping illicit trafficking of antiquities” and ultimately
  • Dr Charuta Kulkarni, IIT, Madras talking about INQUA Database on Global South

Prof. Deivanayagam, Tamil University, Thanjavur: speaking on identification of Chola Bronzes. He explained with photographs pointing out the nuances of the bronzes. To understand his speech, one should know other subjects also, as because of his versatile experience, he explained many details about the icons and sculptures.

Cholas’ bronzes: Chola bronzes were typically of deities, royalty and the politically powerful people of the day-all in a distinctive Chola style, classically representative of the human form, and perfectly proportioned. The sculptures are recognizable by the way the bodies are posed. They are always graceful, elegant and sensuous, particularly if a sculpture is that of a couple, such as Siva and Parvati. The bronzes also depict the “mudras” or gestures derived from classical dance. Chola master sculptors created their works with the cire perdue, or lost wax process, which is still in use today.

There are two methods of casting metal images-solid and hollow casting. The required image is fashioned by the stapathi in bees wax. Then the wax model is given several coats of fine clay. The clay mould is then carefully dried under the sun. After a few days the clay mould is ready for casting. When the wax model is prepared and is ready for the preparation of the clay mould, arrangements for the preparation of the alloy are made. The five metals to be used in the alloy and they are -copper, silver, gold, brass and lead popularly known as panchaloha. In actual practice by chemical testing we have found the percentages of the metals as follows:

How manufactured – alloying technique[1]: Brass is an alloy of copper and zinc. Bronze is an alloy of copper and tin. Normally bronze is a composite alloy of metals-copper, tin, lead, silver and gold in varying proportions. However analysis of South Indian bronzes reveals that they invariably consist of copper, tin, lead, zinc and iron. Trace elements such as arsenic, antimony, Bismuth etc., have been detected. Above l% is considered as a major element and below 0.1% is considered a trace element, e.g. Copper: 79%: Tin 5%, Lead: 13% Zinc 1%; Iron 1%; Trace elements arc arsenic, antimony, nickel and silver and no gold is Present. Manipulating the alloying elements, different shades of metal were produced. This shows tin has been used. Therefore, the alloy is predominantly of copper, tin and lead. The presence of gold and silver is rare or trace. The clay mould with the wax model inside it is baked skillfully over all the wax. When the alloy is ready, it is poured through the orifice into the empty mould in a thin, even and continuous stream. The molten metals allowed for cooling. Then the mould is broken open and the solid metal image is obtained. The image is given finishing touches by the sthapati. This part, the opening of the eyes of the image is what imparts the exquisite expressions on the faces. This is done under some sort of spiritual inspiration. Sometimes, Stapathis are known to take even weeks to open the eves. The science of Image making is dealt with in the ancient Indian science of Silpasastra (Sculpture Science).

Hollow casting- In this case, the object is moulded in clay and the core is coated with wax, which in turn is covered with a coating of clay. After draining the wax by heating, the mould is used for casting. This method is usually associated with North India.

Patina and patination: A Patina is a thin layer of corrosion, usually brown or green, that appears on copper or copper alloys as a result of natural or artificial oxidation. Patina is a thin layer that variously forms on the surface of copper, brass, bronze and similar metals and metal alloys (tarnish produced by oxidation or other chemical processes).On metal, patina is a coating of various chemical compounds such as oxides, carbonates, sulfides, or sulfates formed on the surface during exposure to atmospheric elements (oxygen, rain, acid rain, carbon dioxide, sulfur-bearing compounds. The green patina that forms naturally on copper and bronze, sometimes called verdigris, usually consists of varying mixtures of copper chlorides, sulfides, sulfates and carbonates, depending upon environmental conditions such as sulfur-containing acid rain.

Nishant Zodape and Yash Gupta: They explained “on utilization of open-source software for creating databases”. With “access” how the excel can be used for filling up data and create a document.

 Muthu Shankar: He explained about the “South Indian Historical Atlas” with many facilities, but, it is not available to the public. The primary data for the project comprise historical and geographical information collected from a large corpus of south Indian inscriptions besides archaeological data collected from a series of field surveys supplemented with the data taken from archaeological reports of ASI and other institutions.   Workshop/review meetings were held every six months are to evaluate the progress of the work. The atlas was developed as web-browser software allowing different basic GIS display and database querying functionalities necessary for a user-friendly usage of the Atlas. It uses W3C (WWW Consortium) compliant Graphics /Open GIS so that the system can be accessed through the internet. The atlas has a conceptual resilience on how to curate data, compile information from it, and disseminate it through new digital tools available then, even when illustrative examples in the application of data science mehods in historical research was scarce. This resulted in the curation and archival of historical data sets that encourage data-driven inquiries into the past, while integrating data, computational science methods into historical research.

T. Arun Raj, director NMMA, Noida: Talked on “strategies for stopping illicit trafficking of antiquities.” Perhaps, next to Pramod Joglekar, he directly discussed the issue with examples. He pointed out how Alexander Cunningham used to travel on a donkey visiting archaeological and ancient places for collecting details. The ASI at present listed 3697 monuments as protected. He pointed out how the Delhi Iron pillar was brought to the present place and Rajendra Cholas brought sculptures as “war trophy” to Thanjavur. Alexander Rae and others carried on excavations even before the formation of ASI and collected many objects. He left some at Egmore Museum and others were taken to London. Even now, the ASI is struggling to deal and store the smuggled artefacts returned back to India. In Trichy, the sculptures have been lying there for more than 20 years, which were recovered. Though HR & CE recorded more than 36,000 temples and quantified 9,000 bronzes many others appear to be not accounted. However, for the export of antiquities, thousands of applications are filed with the ASI, Chennai and they are pending. Nealy more than 20,000 applications have been pending, because, there are no expert persons to identify the objects mentioned in the applications as “less than 100 years” or not. Thus, the crucial problem comes here. Once the certificate is given, the antique object would go out of India legally. He pointed out that unlike Sri Lanka, India does not have “Heritage Police,” and hence, the illegal export / smuggling out of the antiquities have been going on. He also pointed out as how a lesson has been included in the CBSE syllabus to adopt a monument nearby school, so that awareness is created not only among the school children, but also the public living surrounding the monument.

Dr Charuta Kulkarni, IIT, Madras: Talking about INQUA Database on Global South[2], she explained related issues. Stemming from the PAGES-INQUA supported early-career researcher workshop on “Past Socio–Environmental Systems (PASES)” (pastglobalchanges.org/calendar/26972) in 2020, the INQUA-funded project “The whole is not the sum of the parts: building a synthesis database of past human–environmental systems in the Global South (pSESYNTH)” has initiated research collaborations among paleoscientists from, and/or working on, the Global South and other underrepresented regions of the world (e.g. Australia, Southeast Europe). Pursuing the Integrated, Coordinated, Open, and Networked (ICON) approach (Koren et al. 2022), the overarching goal of pSESYNTH is to establish, articulate and strengthen regional, interdisciplinary teams for studying past socio–environmental systems of the Global South, and to build the first multi-disciplinary paleo database representing its regions.

pSESYNTH primarily focuses on the Holocene (the last 11.7 kyr) because: (i) there is greater spatial availability and better chronological controls of the datasets compared to the Pleistocene, and (ii) the Holocene is characterized by a progressive degree of anthropogenic influence over landscapes, offering ways to explore the evolution of diverse socio–environmental systems. Under the pSESYNTH framework, linking proxies of environmental change with climatic signals and societal processes (e.g. subsistence strategies, growth rates, migrations) will provide baselines to pose and test multiple hypotheses for explaining the trajectories of socio–environmental systems. Specifically, pSESYNTH activities are being developed around three main objectives.

To explore drivers of past environmental change combining a diverse set of proxy information, organized into three themes: paleoecology (e.g. pollen, charcoal, diatoms), paleoclimatology (e.g. biomarkers, stable isotopes, varves, numerical simulations), and archaeology (e.g. radiocarbon dates, phytoliths, archaeobotanical remains, material culture).

2) To quantitatively analyze the links among paleoecology, paleoclimatology and archaeology, with an emphasis on research questions that can be generic across the Global South (e.g. are there connections, or commonalities, between colonial legacies and the evolution of socio–environmental systems in the Global South?) or specific to each subregion (e.g. at what spatial and temporal scales were human–environmental systems coupled or uncoupled to climatic fluctuations?).

3) To share the outputs and products of the project in the form of a database that meets the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) principles (Wilkinson et al. 2016). pSESYNTH participants will capitalize on existing single- and multi-themed databases (e.g. Neotoma, NOAA, PANGAEA, p3k14c, ArchaeoGlobe) in complementing their data contributions in the novel Global South database. Together, the FAIR–ICON principles will underpin the database organization and will ensure geographic coverage, comparability, and accessibility for time-series data synthesis, which is crucial for mainstreaming paleoscience research from the Global South.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

04-11-2023


[1] T. S. Sridhar (ed.), The Cholas Bronzes – 1000th anniversary of Thanjavur Big Temple celebrations Sept 25th to Oct.4th 2010, The Tamilnadu State Archaeology Department, Chennai, 2011, pp.12-13.

[2] Charuta Kulkarni and others, pSESYNTH project: Community mobilization for a multi-disciplinary paleo database of the Global South, https://pastglobalchanges.org/publications/pages-magazines/pages-magazine/137240

Analysis of Archaeological Material Remains through Geoarchaeology, Geo-Micro Fossils and Literary Sources of South India (1)

Analysis of Archaeological Material Remains through Geoarchaeology, Geo-Micro Fossils and Literary Sources of South India  (1)

Research and seminar under RUSA: The Department of Ancient History and Archaeology, University of Madras conducted a two-day seminar on how geological survey, fossil and literature studies with archaeological remains could contribute to history,, archaeology and related disciplines. The topic is Analysis of Archaeological Material Remains through Geoarchaeology, Geo-Micro Fossils and Literary Sources of South India[1]. This study is being carried out under Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA)[2], a holistic scheme of development for higher education in India programme with funds received. Departments of Ancient History and Archaeology, Geography, Tamil Literature and Mathematics participated work together in this project. Thus it is a multidisciplinary research seminar organized and held on 17th and 18th of August 2023 in the University campus.

The announcement made in June 2023 about the Seminar: About this seminar, there was a news note appeared in Dinamalar, “On behalf of the Department of Ancient History and Archeology of the University of Chennai, next month, on the 13th and 14th,  (now dates changed to August 17th and 18th) research papers are invited in the international seminar on the topic ‘Geoarchaeology, Geomicroforms’. For this, comments including ‘Geo microfossils, Geoarchaeology’ should be sent to the address ‘Head of Department, Department of Ancient History and Archaeology, University of Chennai, Chepakkam Campus, Chennai – 05’ by 30th. For more details, contact on mobile number 94456 28813 or email ‘jsrajan2013@gmail.com’.

Instructions to paper presenters: As the subject matter has been multi-disciplinary, the papers should be theme oriented by the researchers and experts.

  • The papers should be specific on the theme chosen.
  • Inter-disciplinary approach can be there, but, the respective experts can emphasize their field of study and research.
  • The received papers would be scrutinized, processed and selected for presentation.
  • The paper presenters are requested to present papers with PPT bringing out their new findings hitherto published so far.
  • New, current and updated facts and figures; data and information; interpretations and results are expected.
  • No generalizations may be made.
  • Already known facts, details and information etc., need not be compiled and repeated.
  • Papers should be based on original research of the author with primary sources.
  • The final paper should not exceed 10 pages excluding foot notes and references (to be given at the end of the paper).
  • 12 points can be used of any font.

The sub-themes are as follows: – considering the multidisciplinary approach and academic cooperation of different departments and experts, the following topics are also considered for the paer presentation.

  • the scientific study of archaeology of the earth in all aspects
  • sedimentology (study of sediments)
  • stratigraphy (study of adding of rocks),
  •  their part in identifying the actual qualities of the excavations,
  • Comparing and differentiating geoarchaeology and archaeology in the context
  • uses of geospatial technologies such as GIS
  • Indian maritime contacts with ancient civilizations since c.7000 YBP.
  • Palaeolithic to Neolithic cultures and their correlation with the human evolution.
  • Literary evidences for the above in the Indian literature.
  • Correlation, corroboration and correspondence of the above evidences.

Theme of the seminar: Though the studies on Geoarchaeology and Geo-Micro Fossil started and its mineral properties in early 19th century, a complete and holistic understanding of Geoarchaeology and Geo-Microfossil and its formation predictions lacks till date. Most of the study on Geoarchaeology and Geo-Microfossil is centered upon dating the Geoarchaeology and Geo-Microfossil on stylistic grounds, of a particular region without taking all the available evidence. In India the Geoarchaeology and Geo-Microfossil study is usually carried on the basis of formal methods to date them.  Dating the Geoarchaeology and Geo-Micro Fossil is considered to be the most important aspect in the study of Geoarchaeology and Geo-Micro Fossil, whereas, other aspects like the meaning and message behind the Geoarchaeology and Geo-Micro Fossil along with mathematical models in predictions of its age and pigments are usually not given importance because of the lack of insight passed on directly or indirectly from those who made and used the Geoarchaeology and Geo-Micro Fossil (informed method).

Micro-fossil studies in India: Till date, all the reported Geoarchaeology and Geo-Micro Fossil from the district is dated back to the prehistoric times on stylistic grounds, other associated finds in and around the Geoarchaeology and Geo-Micro Fossil site has been overlooked. Microorganisms are known to impact aquifers by modifying their rates of dissolution. In the karstic Edwards Aquifer, microbes colonizing the aquifer surfaces enhance the dissolution rates of the host rock. In the oceanic crustal aquifer, the largest aquifer on Earth, microbial communities can impact ocean productivity, seawater chemistry as well as geochemical cycling throughout the geosphere.  The mineral make-up of the rocks affects the composition and abundance of these sub-sea-floor microbial communities present. Through bioremediation, some microbes can aid in decontaminating freshwater resources in aquifers contaminated by waste products.

Archaeological investigations and Chronology: The detailed biological and palaeontological analysis of microfossils in such contexts may be an important source of archaeological data.  By critically reviewing a range of specialized cross-disciplinary analyses, it is shown how microfossils can be used to provenance inorganic artifacts, reconstruct aspects of their manufacturing technology, and infer their function. In Tamilnadu, excavations have been carried on at different sites and our archaeologists have been getting very important evidences. The script has been dated to c.6th cent.BCE and iron usage go back to c.1200 BCE. Thus, the historical chronology changes with the findings. The Poompuhar underwater excavations might reveal new results that might change the existing position also. Here, the geoarchaeology, micro-fossils and other scientific studies could bring results correlating, corroborating and corresponding with the Sangam Tamil literature. In this way, I hope all the concerned departments come together in this seminar to proceed further.

Updating of subjects is necessary: The updating of any subject has been making it current / recent and bringing to the usage with progressed, developed and advanced information and innovation. As the “goods and services” that are used now, get updated, such old “goods and services” get “outdated” and therefore, “update or perish” would come into play. If “publish or perish” has been common among the researchers, “update or perish” has been an axiom among the science and technology users, as the gadgets, instruments, tools, and machinery get outdated day by day. The exact position and condition would come to the academician, syllabus and the subjects. If Indians continue to read old subjects, that too, without any updating, they themselves better understand what would happen. History writers have not thought about progressed, advanced and developed stages of man, society, and nation in spite of many developments have taken place. Therefore, this multidisciplinary approach would pave way for new findings and interpretations.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

20-08-2023


[1]  Seminar brochure – https://www.unom.ac.in/webportal/uploads/seminar_conference/archaeology_seminar_20230609115934_95211.pdf

[2] The Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan is the central government’s contribution to further the promise held by the rich expanse of India’s state universities. The country’s future lies in empowering these campuses with all that it takes to enhance learning, better research and promote innovation. A centrally sponsored scheme, RUSA understands that sometimes the most important lessons of life are learnt outside the classroom. So whether it is upgrading libraries or computer laboratories, promoting autonomous colleges or clubbing them to consolidate their strength and forming cluster universities, this programme realizes that every institution holds the power to enrich lives through top-class education. With universities, to prepare universe-ready scholars. http://rusa.nic.in/

Teaching of Science and Technology to the students of History or History to the students of science and technology?

Teaching of Science and Technology to the students of History or History to the students of science and technology?

Utility of the subjects and their immediate usage to humanity: Just like tourism, tourism management etc., “History of science and technology”  has been discovered, created and covered under the syllabus and offered as an “elective” subject to the postgraduate students of various disciplines. “History syllabus” has also been formulated to be taught to the students of professional courses like science and technologies, medicine, commerce, management etc., thus, much hype is created with the syllabus to reach and teach history to others.

  • No teacher of those subjects proposed such a scheme that they would go and teach “science and technology” to them. 
  • So why such exigency arises and for what purpose etc., have also to be analyzed.
  • By going through the syllabus, it is clear that the students of professional courses do not gain much by reading such subjects.
  • In every subject, mathematics, physics, chemistry, economics, commerce, accounting etc., the origin, progress and development and also the present and future status and scope of them have already been included in the syllabus and taught.
  • If fact, their subjects have been and are updated and therefore, such subjects lead to innovative inventions that are immediately converted into parts, accessories, spares, gadgets, appliances, tools and so on useful to humanity.

History of Science and Technology: To write, read, teach and learn “History of Science and Technology”, one need not learn the core subject history, but, the history students cannot understand the “History of Science and Technology,” unless, they are taught from the fundamentals.

  • Definitely, all non-history subjects are taught with its origin, which is nothing but history of that subject or perhaps more than that.
  • That is how mathematics, physics, chemistry, botany, zoology at one side, and commerce, accounts, management, factory physics, industrial chemistry, bionics, mnemonics[1] etc., on the other side are taught in the schools and universities.
  •  Though more and more science and technological subjects increase, there is demand for admission.
  • However, recently, the subject “History of Science and Technology” is included for the students of history, archaeology, anthropology, numismatics and related subjects with their own formulated syllabus.
  • But, they are taught only as history and not as the “History of Science and Technology.”

BCE 5,4,3,2,1,0,1,2,3,4,5 CE or BCE 5,4,3,2,1,1,2,3,4,5 CE which is correct?: The scientific study of the origin of the subject “History of Science and Technology”, has been different from the simple subject of “History of Science and Technology, for science students. In fact, under such expected conditions, the history teachers cannot teach the “History of Science and Technology”, to them.

  • The concept of “zero” and infinity, decimal number system, calendar, planetary system, etc., have been perplexing even for science students, and therefore, how the history students read and understand them, is not known.
  • In fact, for chronology, studying eras, dating and other exercises, history teachers have to understand these concepts. 
  • Yet, no history expert is worried about “0” year in between BCE 5,4,3,2,1,1,2,3,4,5 CE years, while computing.
  • Why the Roman numerals – I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, and X did not have “0” is also not known to them!
  • Why the Fibonacci series does not start with “0,” (0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, etc.,) they cannot explain.

These are given only for illustrative purposes and are not exhaustive. Therefore, without knowing “o,” how history teachers would teach about, chronology and related historical developments.

Historical time is linear or cyclic, if “history repeats”!: In science and technology, anything linear or cyclic is understood easily and applied practically, but, in history, nowadays, some historians claim that history is linear and not cyclic. However, having claimed, they have not been able to define exactly how the history has been linear, when “history repeats itself”[2]. Just because, historian has decided take the expression “linear,” he cannot make history “linear.”[3] Again such expertise and elite historians do not bother about the axes and the origin, the zero point. Not only X and Y axes, even Z axis has the other side also.  How then, historians visualize the –ve axes and interpret historical events. Of course, they are totally not bothered as to whether it is 2D or 3D, yet, they prefer to use such terminology in history and historiography.

Using scientific terminology is different from actually working scientifically: Just by using certain terms and expressions, scientific, scientific temper, linear, dynamic, static, etc., at one side and heuristic[4], holistic, euphemistic, epistemological, on the other side, history cannot become scientific or technological, as none of the historical hypotheses, theories and concepts can be tested in the laboratory.

  • Earlier, historians used to claim with pride that they should have object in mind, objective mentality and objectivity in dealing with historical facts.
  • Now, they assert that they need not have such standards (objectivity).
  • Ten historians can write history about the same “object,” and all the ten histories become histories of the object!
  • But, science says one is one only; 1+1=2 only, all have accepted universally for thousands of years and it continues.
  • Historians and history teachers cannot say in history about anything within a year, 10 years, 100 years… in the same way again and again.
  • In India itself,
    • grandfather / grandmother read one history,
    • father / mother read another history,
    • son / daughter read yet another history and
    • now grandson / granddaughter reads still-yet another history!
  • This type of history is found in the case of the –
    • Grandfather – Chandragupta Maurya c.324/31 – 297 BCE
    • Father – Bindusara – c.297-273 BCE
    • Grandson – Asoka – c.268-232 BCE

Thus, within three generations, grandfather and father were prehistoric, illiterate and unhistorical also, wheras, the grandson was historic and literate! Again, the grandfather was a Jain, the father Hindu and the grandson a Buddhist! A perfect secular model family!

  • In India, there had / have been millions of practices, procedures, and standards followed in day to day life for more than 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000 YBP and more. They had / have  and are historical only, unlike their “histories” produced or manufactured by the European Company writers and the 1947-Indian history writers.
  • Once a history writer becomes ideological, then, no two historians accept and history in India, it always becomes some sort of TV-debate where four persons come and talk about the same subject in four different ways! They come together only to differ from each other and not to come to any conclusion.

Blind Men and an Elephant: The history writers of the European Companies always mention this “cock and bull story”[5] to denigrate Indians for their acumen[6].  Not only non-Indians have read the sources properly, understood the concept and interpret such stories, but also the listeners, readers and others to verify the authenticity of the stories floated about themselves. The irony has been, this “cock and bull ……….story” has been and is still included in the syllabus and the naïve and gullible teachers go on teach and our students read and appreciate the “idiocy” – stupidity, absurdity and silliness of Indians, and believe that they (the Europeans) only taught Indians how to count, learn and dress properly. More and more “Mayos”[7] have been created to spread such “maya,” and when they would be liberated and brought to light from such darkness[8] is not known.

Any subject is offered as an elective, choice or forced: Again teaching history to other disciplines commerce, economics, management, medicine etc., is different from the teaching of “History of Science and Technology” to history students themselves. Just because, history subject is losing its scope in the academics, the history teachers cannot introduce some syllabus and try to impose the same old stuff on the non-history students.

  • The utility, benefit and value of the subject also come into play, when any student selects any subject voluntarily, as an elective or for some other reason.
  • The students of the “History of Science and Technology” are interested in progress, development and growth in their studies, research and further pursuits.
  • Therefore, they may not be interested in what the dynasties fought with each other, rulers invaded other territories or autocrats made the people suffer.
  • Even the social, communal, religious, societal, and other aspects and related issues are also irrelevant to them, as long as they divide people based on any factor.

The utility value of the subject: Ultimately, when job, assignment and employment are decided on the certificates and diplomas received, yet, the application of the learned subject in the field decides the fate of the employee, worker or staff.

  • A fitter, electrician, plumber and any other technician after getting certificates, has been ready to work in the field, as he has to carry out his job, as otherwise, he will be sent out immediately on the first day, when he is found that he is not able tp work in his field, in spite of having diploma / certificates in his trade or many certificates including other disciplines. “A jack of all trades but master of none”.
  • So also a professionally qualified engineer or doctor or any other expert.
  • “If you know the job, come and join immediately,” that type of policy is followed today, walk-in interview, selection and appointment order.
  • All the certificates and diplomas come thereafter, just for verification.
  • If you have 10 certificates, diplomas and degrees in one discipline or 10 different disciplines, but, you cannot work properly, you will be fired, because, the employers want the work to go on.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

12-08-2023


[1] Mnemonics is the study and development of systems for improving and assisting the memory, A mnemonic device (or memory device, is any learning technique that aids information retention or retrieval (remembering) in the human memory for better understanding.

[2] Historic recurrence is the repetition of similar events in history. The concept of historic recurrence has variously been applied to overall human history (e.g., to the rises and falls of empires), to repetitive patterns in the history of a given polity, and to any two specific events which bear a striking similarity. Hypothetically, in the extreme, the concept of historic recurrence assumes the form of the Doctrine of Eternal Recurrence, which has been written about in various forms since antiquity and was described in the 19th century by Heinrich Heine and Friedrich Nietzsche. While it is often remarked that “history repeats itself”, in cycles of less than cosmological duration this cannot be strictly true. In this interpretation of recurrence, as opposed perhaps to the Nietzschean interpretation, there is no metaphysics. Recurrences take place due to ascertainable circumstances and chains of causality.

[3]  In the case of electricity, electronics, computers, digital technology etc., the electric pulse is sinusoidal, digitized to square-shaped pulses and so on. All such processes cannot be brought under any “linear” explanation or interpretation of history.

[4] A heuristic is a mental shortcut commonly used to simplify problems and avoid cognitive overload. Heuristics are part of how the human brain evolved and is wired, allowing individuals to quickly reach reasonable conclusions or solutions to complex problems.

[5] Cock and bull story, far-fetched and fanciful story or tale of highly dubious validity produced by the British county hoteliers / inns to attract their customers.

[6] The Buddhist text Tittha Sutta, Udāna 6.4, Khuddaka Nikaya, contains one of the earliest versions of the story. The Tittha Sutta is dated to around c. 500 BCE, during the lifetime of the Buddha. An alternative version of the parable describes sighted men, experiencing a large statue on a dark night, or feeling a large object while being blindfolded. They then describe what it is they have experienced. In its various versions, it is a parable that has crossed between many religious traditions and is part of Jain, Hindu and Buddhist texts of 1st millennium CE or before. The story also appears in 2nd millennium Sufi and Baháʼí Faith lore. The tale later became well known in Europe, with 19th century American poet John Godfrey Saxe creating his own version as a poem, with a final verse that explains that the elephant is a metaphor for God, and the various blind men represent religions that disagree on something no one has fully experienced. The story has been published in many books for adults and children, and interpreted in a variety of ways.

[7] Katherine Mayo, an American lady  and also reportedly a historian wrote a book Mother India (1927) became  a polemical book as it contained many narratives of  grudge, hate and vengeance against Indian – society, religion and culture. Indians do not know any such book has been written about American or European society, religion and culture.

[8] Mohammedan or Mughal court historians always dub that the kafirs (non-believers, non-Mohammedans) of Hindustan were in the jahallia (in the darkness) and they were trying to show nur (light) through jihad (holy war) with their revealed book (al-kitabiya), as the kafirs do not are any revealed scriptures / book..

The updating, revising and correcting history subject – why controversy about it?:

The updating, revising and correcting history subject – why controversy about it?:

What is updating of the subject – history?: The updating of any subject has been making it current/recent and bringing to the usage with progressed, developed and advanced information and innovation[1]. As the “goods and services” that are used now, get updated, such old “goods and services” get “outdated” and therefore, “update or perish” would come into play. The same position and conditions would come to the academician, syllabus and the subjects. If Indians continue to read old subjects, that too, without any updating, they themselves better understand what would happen. History writers have not thought about progressed, advanced and developed stages of man, society, and nation in spite of many developments have taken place.

  1. A reached a place B in the first century.
  2. C travelled and reached the same place B in the 10th century.
  3. D started the journey and arrived at the same place B in the 20th century.

How can history be updated here?  A historian has to think about –

  • the mode of transport used,
  • the route followed,
  • the nature of roads and
  • other factors.

Historians have to tell explicitly as to whether the travellers used the same transport from the first century to 20th century or whether the mode of transport changed or not.

  • Satavahanas produced very fine and excellent jewellery in c.3rd cent.BCE
  • Rajaputs produced fabulous and fantastic jewel ornaments in 10th century CE.
  • Indians produced such fine, fabulous and fantastic jewel ornaments in 20th century CE.

Here, how the same jewel manufacturing technique had been in existence and continuing for more than 2300 years? Therefore, historians have to update the details giving the historical development of transport and the jewellery manufacture. The outcome – reaching destination B and the jewellery reminds the same, but not the science and technology behind them.

What is revising history?: As historians cry, it is not “revisionism,” as they apprehend in the negative perspective[2].  Now revising any subject is – making revisions of the syllabus within a short span of time, so that all the portions are covered and ready for the examination. The students are also relaxed so that they could revise their subjects and portions within a short and specific period and get ready for writing exams. Therefore, it has been very common to delete or exclude certain chapters from the subject books. Or they may declare that they are not included in the “Syllabus for the examination purpose.” Thus, the students are also assured of not getting any questions from the “out of syllabus” or “out of portion.” So when this has been going on for many years in all subjects, including history, why suddenly cry foul nowadays, particularly for the last 70 years.  

Syllabus revision and propaganda: In implementing educational policy, the study of subjects and structuring syllabus, generally, the government takes control. This has been the practice of the nations following the European and then US models of curriculum. However, every nation or country has its own educational system, subjects for study and syllabus suitable to the students with changing times.

  • That Indians have been living with their thousands of years of civilization, culture, tradition and heritage confirm the existence of such a well-structured, established and proven system oriented to the public.
  • The material cultural evidences of the past thousands of years prove this fact. There could be interference, intervention and revision for imposition, modification and improvement in between, because of the non-Indian domination.
  • Yet, most of the Indian teaching, learning and associated processes have been continuing at different levels from villages to metros.
  • At the time of examination, “revision” is always talked about, as it is only Re-Visioning of the subject studied and thus getting ready for the re-reading of the subject read again.
  • As there is choice system, many students skip certain portions, units and parts and concentrate on scoring more marks. In fact, the teachers themselves advise that certain portions, units and parts are not for examinations, as they are not covered or taught or not necessary for academic importance for higher studies.
  • However, revision makes campaigning, agitation and propaganda running riot among the peer groups.

Why history is losing importance and job-market?: In the case of history subject, its importance has been dwindling down, as there have been no takers at the college or University level. As most of the students go for other job-oriented disciplines, these subjects like history, etc., are not felt any importance. Thus, the history subject has been scrapped and the departments closed down. In fact, the irony has been for 5 to 10 students, there have been more staff and it is questioned by the audit and other authorities, as they have to spend lakhs and crores to run the department with staff paying salaries and recurring expenditures. Even for archaeology, questions have been raised about why spend crores for digging and taking out certain objects and say that men lived and used lithic tools etc., again and again. Moreover, the dividing of people with biased ideology, influenced philosophy and predisposed thought have been hallmark of historians after independence.  The utility value is considered of for any subject or discipline.

What is correcting of history?: Many times how historians have been so vociferous, raucous and boisterous about updating, revising and correcting history. In other subjects, there is no problem, as they correct and proceed.

  • The word “atom” has been a misnomer, a + tom = one that cannot be divided, but atom can be divided.
  • Dalton’s atomic theory said, “Atoms cannot be subdivided, created, or destroyed,” but, it is totally wrong.
  • Till Giornado Bruno and others, the Europeans believed that Earth was stationary and all planets revolve around it[3].
  • “Flat Earth Theory” has been there and still there are such believers[4].  
  • Origin of man (many theories[5])

There have been many examples, but, few important and well-known have been cited for illustrative purposes. These have been corrected and such subjects have been updated for the benefit of humanity. But, historians still believe in race, ethnicity, colour, creed and related issues and hypotheses and theories developed out of such ideas floated before 20th and 21st centuries. Therefore, history subject has to be updated with science and technology.

Examinations quell and students excel: As the examinations came near, these objections that appeared in the news and the associated politics also died down. The students started preparing and appeared for the examinations. They scored good marks and they proceeded further accordingly with their scored marks, and merit. In spite of politicization regionalization and other ideological obstructions, the students have come out with laurels proceeding to higher, professional and other studies. Now, they have been well-informed and they know what they want and how to get them. Thus, in spite of other diversions and attractions, they have been marching towards the goals. With their contribution in future, perhaps, the future of India still marches ahead economically and scientifically.

For updating, revising and correcting history: Few illustrations are given for the purpose of updating.

  • The evolution of man with lithic and metal has to be periodized with the available archaeological evidences.
  • The science and technology behind the metallurgy have to be arranged date-wise.
  • The sculptural evidences can be taken to match with the literature and thus for history.
  • Indian history has to be written with the two-sided view of the narratives and discourses.
  •  History of housing, food, hygiene, medicine, education, science and technology, and all related aspects come into history with chronology.
  • The chronology of science and technology has to match with the Indian historical development of man.

Indians and Indian students have been well-informed: Now out of 140 crores / 1400 million, Indian population, 120 crores / 1200 million have cellphones. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Secretary Apurva Chandra said that India has over 1.2 billion mobile phone users and 600 million smartphone users[6]. Therefore, news, information and details reach more than 100 crores people immediately on any subject. Indians, irrespective of their status, they have been mature enough to understand the issues, problems and controversies. The youngsters and students have been more conscious about their future and thus, the majority of them have been concentrating on their studies and careers.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

06-08-2023


[1]  If “publish or perish” has been common among the researchers, “update or perish” has been axiom among the science and technology users, as the gadgets, instruments, tools, machinery get outdated day by day.

[2] In historiography, historical revisionism is the reinterpretation of a historical account. It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or timespan or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.

[3] The geocentric and heliocentric theories, their propagators and prosecution of heliocentric scientists by the Church can be read in any book. In fact, we physics students used to read from D. S. Mathur’s “Properties of matter” book.

[4] Flat Earth is an archaic and scientifically disproven conception of the Earth’s shape as a plane or disk. Many ancient cultures subscribed to a flat-Earth cosmography. The idea of a spherical Earth appeared in ancient Greek philosophy with Pythagoras (6th century BCE). However, most pre-Socratics (6th–5th century BCE) retained the flat-Earth model. In the early 4th century BCE, Plato wrote about a spherical Earth. By about 330 BC, his former student Aristotle had provided strong empirical evidence for a spherical Earth. Knowledge of the Earth’s global shape gradually began to spread beyond the Hellenistic world. By the early period of the Christian Church, the spherical view was widely held, with some notable exceptions. It is a historical myth that medieval Europeans generally thought the Earth was flat. This myth was created in the 17th century CE by Protestants to argue against Catholic teachings. Despite the scientific fact and obvious effects of Earth’s sphericity, pseudoscientific flat-Earth conspiracy theories are espoused by modern flat Earth societies and, increasingly, by unaffiliated individuals using social media

[5]  Out of Africa, Neanderthal etc..

[6] The Secretary informed the audience about the media landscape in India and said that India is a country with a tradition media comprised of 897 television channels, of which over 350 were news channels, and over 80 thousand newspapers coming out in various languages. However he added, recently there has been a shift towards new media with youngsters consuming information from this new media.

Dholavira in Gujarat on UNESCO World Heritage list

Dholavira in Gujarat on UNESCO World Heritage list

Dholavaira, how excavated, reported and got recognition: India had submitted the nomination dossier for ‘Dholavira: A Harappan City to the World Heritage Centre’ in January, 2020[1]. The site was on the UNESCO’s tentative list since 2014[2]. It is one of the very few well-preserved urban settlements in south Asia dating from the 3rd to mid-2nd millennium BCE. Spread over 22 hectare, the Harappan-era metropolis is the fifth largest archaeological site of the Indus Valley Civilisation, dating back to around 3000 BC and is believed to have been occupied till 1500 BC. It draws its name from present-day village Dholavira. Locally known as Kotda Timba, the expansive site was discovered in the 1960s by archaeologist Jagat Pati Joshi, who served as director general of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) between 1987 and 1990. The site was excavated under the supervision of ASI archaeologist Ravindra Singh Bisht in the 1990s. Talking to The Indian Express, Bisht: “This is recognition of my work. I am surely very happy. It is also a great thing as Dholavira is the first Harappan site from India to be inscribed on the world heritage sites list of UNESCO. I am doubly happy because I worked on Rani Ki Vav in Patan which has also been declared as world heritage site of UNESCO.” The 77-year-old retired as joint director general of ASI in 2004.

More details in the archaeological point of view, as given by ASI[3]: Dholavira in Gujarat, which got the tag of a UNESCO World Heritage Site today, is a Harappan-era city sprawled over 100 hectares on Khadir, one of the islands in the Rann of Kutch. One of the five largest cities of the Indus Valley Civilisation, Dholavira is located about 250 km from Bhuj. It has two seasonal streams, Mansar and Manhar, and journey to the site takes one through the wildlife-rich desert plains of Rann of Kutch. The property comprises two parts, a walled city and a cemetery to its west, a government release said, adding that Dholavira flourished for nearly 1,500 years. According to an Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) note on Dholavira[4], excavations at the site have revealed seven cultural stages documenting the rise and fall of the Indus Civilisation. The city, it said, is also remarkable for its planning and architecture. Among the marvels in Dholavira are the remains of two open air stadiums and a water harvesting system. “The salient components of the full-grown cityscape consisted of a bipartite ‘citadel’, a ‘middle town’ and a ‘lower town’, two ‘stadia’, an ‘annexe’, a series of reservoirs all set within an enormous fortification running on all four sides,” said the ASI note. The ASI note says that initial stages of the civilisation show the inhabitants’ preference for colourful clay for plastering buildings, but this came to an “abrupt end…as if under a royal decree or by a resolute public consensus”.The excavations point to a general decline in the city’s maintenance before a temporary desertion. The ASI note says that when the city is populated again, ceramic traditions make an appearance and “classical planning was largely given a go-by”.”Bricks were no longer in use. While many of the pottery forms and decorative motifs were still in vogue, new ceramics in the form of white painted black-and-red and white painted grey wares along with a coarse ware bearing incised or appliqué or both kinds of designs and also some Bara related pottery made their appearance,” it said.

Dholavira in Gujarat on UNESCO World Heritage list:The Harappan city of Dholavira, in present-day Gujarat, was on 27-07-2021, Tuesday named the 40th Indian site on UNESCO’s World Heritage list[5]. UNESCO’s announcement came just days after another site, Ramappa Temple in Telangana, was admitted to the list on 25-07-2021, Sunday. “The ancient city of Dholavira is one of the most remarkable and well-preserved urban settlements in South Asia dating from the 3rd to mid-2nd millennium BCE (Before Common Era). Discovered in 1968, the site is set apart by its unique characteristics, such as its water management system, multi-layered defensive mechanisms, extensive use of stone in construction and special burial structures,” UNESCO said[6].  A range of artefacts of copper, shell, stone, jewellery, terracotta and ivory had been found at the site. “The two newly inscribed World Heritage Sites offer great insight into the knowledge and ways of life of earlier societies, customs, and communities,” UNESCO said. Located in the Kutch district, Dholavira is the larger of the two most remarkable excavations of the Indus Valley Civilisation dating back to about 4,500 years ago. The site had been on UNESCO’s tentative list since 2014 and India had submitted its dossier in January 2020, a Culture Ministry statement said. A World Heritage Site is a location with an “outstanding universal value”, which signifies cultural and/or natural significance which is so exceptional as to transcend national boundaries and to be of common importance for present and future generations of all humanity[7]. Gujarat has a total of four World Heritage Sites now. The other three are Champaner near Pavagadh, Rani ki Vav in Patan and Ahmedabad[8].

Delighted, says PM[9]: Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in a series of tweets that he was delighted by the development[10]. “Dholavira was an important urban centre and is one of our most important linkages with our past. It is a must visit, especially for those interested in history, culture and archaeology. I first visited Dholavira during my student days and was mesmerised by the place. As CM of Gujarat, I had the opportunity to work on aspects relating to heritage conservation and restoration in Dholavira. Our team also worked to create tourism-friendly infrastructure there,” Mr. Modi said.

India has 40 world heritage properties overall, which includes 32 cultural, seven natural and one mixed property: Union Culture Minister G. Kishan Reddy said the inclusion of Dholavira was another feather in India’s cap, putting it in the league of countries with 40 or more World Heritage sites[11]. Ten of these sites had been added since 2014, when the Modi government first came to power, he said. “With this successful nomination, India has 40 world heritage properties overall, which includes 32 cultural, seven natural and one mixed property,” the Culture Ministry said. Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani said via a tweet[12]: “It is a matter of immense pride that the @UNESCO has conferred the World Heritage tag to Dholavira, a Harappan city in Kutch. This shows the firm commitment of our Honourable Prime Minister Shri @narendramodi ji towards promoting Indian culture and heritage.”

Here’s the list of 40 World Heritage Sites in India[13]: , India has 40 world heritage properties overall, which includes 32 cultural, seven natural and one mixed propertyand they are as follows[14]:

1. Dholavira, Gujarat
2. Ramappa Temple,
Telangana
3. Taj Mahal, Agra
4. Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh
5. Hampi, Karnataka
6. Ajanta Caves, Maharashtra
7. Ellora Caves, Maharashtra
8. Bodh Gaya, Bihar
9. Sun Temple, Konark, Odisha
10. Red Fort Complex, Delhi
11. Buddhist monuments at Sanchi, Madhya Pradesh
12. Chola Temples, Tamil Nadu
13. Kaziranga Wild Life Sanctuary, Assam
14. Group of Monuments at Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu
15. Sundarbans National Park, West Bengal
16. Humayun’s Tomb, New Delhi
17. Jantar Mantar, Jaipur, Rajasthan
18. Agra Fort, Uttar Pradesh
19. Group of Monuments at Pattadakal, Karnataka
20. Elephanta Caves, Maharashtra
21. Mountain Railways of India
22. Nalanda Mahavihara (Nalanda University), Bihar
23. Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus (formerly Victoria Terminus), Maharashtra
24. Qutub Minar and its Monuments, New Delhi
25. Champaner-Pavagadh Archaeological Park, Gujarat
26. Great Himalayan National Park, Himachal Pradesh
27. Hill Forts of Rajasthan
28. Churches and Convents of Goa
29. Rock Shelters of Bhimbetka, Madhya Pradesh
30. Manas Wild Life Sanctuary, Assam
31. Fatehpur Sikri, Uttar Pradesh
32. Rani Ki Vav, Patan, Gujarat
33. Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan
34. Nanda Devi and Valley of Flowers National Parks, Uttarakhand
35. Western Ghats
36. Kanchenjunga National Park, Sikkim
37. Capitol Complex, Chandigarh
38. The Historic City of Ahmedabad
39. The Victorian and Art Deco Ensemble of Mumbai
40. The Pink City – Jaipur

Indians, as a whole, should know and feel about their antiquity and unity of the Indians living in this vas geographical area touching the boundaries of other ancient civilizations 5000 YBP. Some 3000-2000 years back most of those civilizations disappeared, but the Indian civilization has been living with all the inherent continued factors of culture, tradition, and heritage.

© K.V. Ramakrishna Rao

28-07-2021


[1] Indian Express, Harappan city of Dholavira listed among UNESCO World Heritage sites, Express News Service | Ahmedabad, New Delhi |July 27, 2021 4:08:58 pm.

[2] https://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/art-and-culture/harappan-era-city-dholavira-inscribed-on-unesco-world-heritage-list-7424926/

[3] NDTV, Harappan City Dholavira Gets World Heritage Tag, What You Need To Know, Edited by Saikat Kumar BoseUpdated: July 27, 2021 10:39 pm IST.

[4] https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/harappan-city-dholavira-gets-world-heritage-tag-what-you-need-to-know-2496379

[5] The Hindu, Dholavira in Gujarat on UNESCO World Heritage list, SPECIAL CORRESPONDENTNEW DELHI/AHMEDABAD, JULY 27, 2021 16:34 IST; UPDATED: JULY 28, 2021 01:09 IST

[6] https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/harappan-era-city-dholavira-inscribed-on-unesco-world-heritage-list/article35559688.ece

[7] India Today, Harappan-era city of Dholavira gets Unesco’s World Heritage Site tag,  India Today Web Desk , New Delhi, July 27, 2021; UPDATED: July 27, 2021 16:10 IST

[8] https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/harrappan-dholavira-unesco-world-heritage-site-tag-1833254-2021-07-27

[9] Deccan Herald, Harappan-era Gujarat city Dholavira inscribed on UNESCO World Heritage List, Satish Jha, DHNS, Ahmedabad,  JUL 27 2021, 17:44 IST; UPDATED: JUL 27 2021, 21:43 IST

[10] https://www.deccanherald.com/national/west/harappan-era-gujarat-city-dholavira-inscribed-on-unesco-world-heritage-list-1013461.html

[11] Economic Times, Harappan-era city Dholavira inscribed on UNESCO World Heritage List, PTI, Last Updated: Jul 27, 2021, 03:59 PM IST.

[12] https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/harappan-era-city-dholavira-inscribed-on-unesco-world-heritage-list/articleshow/84789331.cms

[13] Hindustan times, Unesco World Heritage tag: Here’s list of all 40 Indian sites after Dholavira addition, By hindustantimes.com | Edited by Kunal Gaurav, Hindustan Times, New Delhi, UPDATED ON JUL 27, 2021 06:30 PM IST

[14] https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/unesco-world-heritage-list-here-are-all-40-indian-sites-after-dholavira-addition-101627389792414.html

Why the “Buddhist relics” bogey is  again at Ayodhya even after the rejection of the Buddhist petition by the Supreme Court and settled the issue? [2]

Why the “Buddhist relics” bogey is  again at Ayodhya even after the rejection of the Buddhist petition by the Supreme Court and settled the issue? [2]

14 petitions including that of the Buddhist claim considered and rejected

The Supreme Court has already covered the Buddhist claim and settled: The Supreme Court in its judgment in Civil Appeal Nos 10866-10867 of 2010, with other 14, dated running into 1045 pages have already gone into all the details as pointed out below:

Explanation : For the purposes of this section any property comprised in Hindu, Mohammedan, Buddhist religious or charitable endowment shall be deemed to be property vested in trust for a specific purpose, and the manager of any such property shall be deemed to be the trustee thereof [Para.411, p.455]. Artefacts, including architectural fragments which have been recovered during excavation have a distinct non-Islamic origin. Though individually, some of the artefacts could also have been utilised in a structure of Buddhist or Jain origins, there is no evidence of the underlying structure being of an Islamic religious nature. The conclusion which has been drawn by the ASI that the nature of the underlying structure and the recoveries which have been made would on stylistic grounds suggest the existence of temple structure dating back to the twelfth century A.D. would on a balance of probabilities be a conclusion which is supported by evidence [p.595]. Finally, the ASI, in its final report dated 22 August 2003, concludes by indicating that:  “―Now, viewing in totality and taking into account the archaeological evidence of a massive structure just below the disputed structure and evidence of continuity in structural phases from the tenth century onwards upto the construction of the disputed structure along with the yield of stone and decorated bricks as well as mutilated sculpture of divine couple and carved architectural members including foliage patters, amalaka, kapotapali doorjamb with semi-circular pilaster, broken octagonal shaft of black schist pillar, lotus motif, circular shrine having pranala (waterchute) in the north, fifty pillar bases in association of the huge structure, are indicative of remains which are distinctive features found associated with the temples of north India”. (Emphasis supplied) [p.524, 563].

Aamalak considered and rejected by the SC-2

The so-called “Aamalak” has also been dealt with: During the course of excavation, ASI recovered an Amalaka‘ which is typically a segmented or notched globular stone disc with ridges on its rim with which sits on top of the Hindu temples‘ shikhara or main tower[1].    An amalaka may also resemble a lotus and is a symbol of a deity seated below. ASI also recovered a ghatapalava‘ motif which is associated with a ceremonial offering to a deity and as a symbol has been used to decorate shrines [p.587]. These issues, discussion and counter-arguments had gone on for the last 28 years since 1992, when such broken sculptures were revealed along with the 16 line inscription. But, some people and the media without any reason but with vested interests, rake up the same issue, that has been settled by the SC.

Irfan Habib floating - planted hypothesis 2003

Brought from outside and planted: the hypothesis put forward by the eminent historians: When Ajay Mitra Sastri deciphered the 29 lines inscriptions, the eminent historians sarcastically remarked that “I must have been planted there bringing from outside”! They did not care to respect their own respectable college, Ajay Mitra Sastri. That was the decency and decorum of the eminent historians ganged up and started identifying as “Babri historians” i.e, supporters of Babur, his demolition of a temple there at Ayodhya and appealing for the reconstruction of “Babri masjid”! Without any regard for anything, they passed resolutions at the annual sessions of Indian History Congress (IHC) that has been reportedly working for “scientific and secular history.” In 2003, scholar Pushpa Prasad presented a paper during the IHC, describing the Lucknow Museum’s Inscription No. 53.4. Citing palaeographic grounds, she claimed that its two fragments originate from two different epigraphs: the top one records a Gahadavala land grant, and the bottom one mentions a Chandela invocation to a deity. According to her, the handwritings on two fragments are from two different scribes. Moreover, the letters in the upper fragment are smaller in size, compared to the letters on the upper fragment. As I was there at the session, when asked to read the original inscriptions, she could not do so. However, her paper was duly published[2].  Some scholars such as Irfan Habib have alleged that the Vishnu-Hari inscription was brought to Ayodhya from the Lucknow State Museum and planted at the Babri mosque site. Their theory states that the Vishnu-Hari inscription is actually the Treta Ka Thakur inscription, which was found by Alois Anton Führer in the 19th century. But, Kunal Kishore has exposed their biased reading, impartial interpretation and suppression of facts[3].

Ayodhya insriptions 20 lines deciphered

December 2019 – The frivolous petition filed by the eminent historians and its dismissal: Forty eminent academics, and rights activists have filed a review petition against the Supreme Court’s verdict in the Ayodhya dispute appeals passed in November[4]. In the petition, raising concerns over the impact the verdict could have on the “social fabric” of the country, the petitioners have sought a relook into the November 9 verdict. The petitioners include Prabhat Patnaik, Aakar Patel, Irfan Habib, Harsh Mander, Farah Naqvi, Nandini Sundar, Shabnam Hashmi, John Dayal and Jayati Ghosh among others and the review petition has been filed through senior advocate Prashant Bhushan[5]. The Supreme Court threw out multiple pleas for a review of its ruling handing over the entire disputed land in Ayodhya to the deity, Ram Lalla[6]. At least 19 review pleas had been filed in the case. These included petitions by the Nirmohi Akhara, one of the litigants in the case that sought a clarification on its role and representation on a trust that the court had said should be set up to construct a temple at the site[7]. While a group of intellectuals had called upon the court to reflect on and “correct” its ruling, several petitions by Muslims had challenged the decision to hand over the land on which the Babri Masjid once stood to the Hindus. Thus, it is evident that the eminent historians have just filed the petition to get newspaper publicity. The learned advocate Prashant Bhushan must have known very well about the legal position, yet, to satisfy their clients, he would have filed the petition to get dismissed.

Sketch of RJB in 1717

Why the eminent historians and their followers do not bother about 100 crores of Indians?: Historians, researchers and writers should address all Indians taking care of their interests. They cannot be biased, prejudiced and predisposed against any particular group of people, faith or religion. As for as the “BM-RJB” issue is concerned, they have been producing more and literature printing in the popular media to propagate against the Hindus, under the guise of secularism. During the last 40-60 years, they have exhibited certain characteristic approach, attitude and mindset towards the other side of the audience:

  1. They have revealed their scant regard for the judicial judgments at High courts and Supreme Court questioning the wisdom of the judges.

  1. The subjects of history, archaeology, historiography etc., are not for them alone for interpretation.

  1. Of course, as the stuff written in English gets circulated through a selective targeted groups, audience and ideologically receptive regulars, they do not bother about others. The proceedings of the Indian History Congress have been manipulated during the last 40 years[8].

  1. Just like the Mohammedan court-historians, a group or groups of historians, researchers and writers, who have been regularly writing in EPW, The Hindu, Frontline and a dozen internet dailies. They do not or do not want to hear the other side, but ant only their views ti get accommodated, printed and circulated.

  1. Whereas, in india, more than 100 crores people, who have also been watching these groups, have understood that they have not been balanced, but biased; they have been against the sentiments of the Hindus under the guise of secularism; they have been working for the Mohammedan cause portraying themselves as “Babri historians” suppressing the iconoclasm;

  1. Indians from the southern states wonder to see the idols placed at a distance, after going round and round with a lot of security and all, as they have been visiting great temples because of the grandeur, sanctity and religious obligation. They wonder as to where was the temple and why they are treated in that way.

  1. Therefore, even after 1992, with a little or less facilities at Ayodhya, why crores of peoples have been going there to have a darshan of Ram-Lalla, they have to ponder over. They never bothered about the facilities, amenities and conveniences provided to the pilgrims. Their knowledge, wisdom and expertise never cared for the rights of the yatris going there.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

01-06-2020

Sketch of RJB in 1889

[1] Adam Hardy, Indian temple architecture form and transformation: the Kamata and Dravida tradition, 7th to 13th centuries. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, 1995.

[2] Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 64th session, Mysore, 2003 / 2004, Vol. 64, pp. 348–361.

[3] Kunal Kishore, Ayodhya Revisited, Ocean Books Pvt.Ltd., New Delhi, 2016.

[4] The Wire, Academics, Activists File Review Petition Against Ayodhya Verdict,11/DEC/2019

[5] https://thewire.in/law/ayodhya-review-petition

[6] Economics Times, Supreme Court dismisses pleas seeking review of Nov 9 Ayodhya case verdict, By Samanwaya Rautray,Last Updated: Dec 13, 2019, 06.40 AM IST

[7] https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/supreme-court-dismisses-all-ayodhya-review-petitions/articleshow/72491089.cms

[8] I have been a life-member since 1985 and attending many annual proceedings since 1985 and participated actively, contested elections, and presented papers also.