National Seminar on Salvage Archaeology and Heritage Management in India held at Meenakshi College, Chennai on November 29th and 30th 2016 [Second day proceedings]

National Seminar on Salvage Archaeology and Heritage Management in India held at Meenakshi College, Chennai on November 29^th and 30^th 2016 [Second day proceedings]

30-11-2016 – the second day proceedings of NSSAHMI-16: First, R. Mani, Conservation Assistant, ASI (Retd) explained how a mantap at Madhavaram was relocated, after dismantling the structure part by part with the cost of Rs. 25 lakhs.  As the people of the areas wanted the mantap to be renovated, the work was carried on. It has been on the way to Tirupati and was constructed for the pilgrims to stay. There was a tank also behind, but, it disappeared. The tanks were constructed near by the Mantap-rest houses or behind for the purposes of pilgrims to carry out morning and daily routines during their stay and proceed. During interaction, the following facts were known:

1. There is no documentation as to how many such mantaps / rest houses for pilgrims constructed are available between two particular pilgrimage centres.
2. The distance between such mantaps could be about 5 kms.
3. Now, many mantaps right in front of temples at srirangam, Tirivannamalai, Kanchipuram and other important religious centres have been illegally occupied by the persons with vested interests and political clout, using them as go-down, workshop, hotel, shop, even as part of house.
4. Though, ASI gives complaints about and against such illegal occupations and encroachments to Police, Revenue officials, no proper action, action is taken.
5. This emboldens Act and Rules violators and make them disrespect the ASI authorities and belittle the Acts and Rules related Archaeological Monuments etc.

Salvage archaeology – P. Venkatesan, Director, Ministry of Tourism: With his experience, he had elaborately dealt with the subject matter. Differentiating between tangible and intangible heritage, he explained the nuances of heritage relating to inheritance, legacy, obtained from forefathers, religious practices, customs, celebrations and so on. After World War – II, as many cities were destroyed and monuments made crumbling conditions, the westerners thought of “Salvage archaeology”.  Urbanization with its building activities etc., has affected the monuments adversely. We should respect the Mother earth “Vasunthara bahuratnaha” [Mother Earth contains many diamonds] as it contains many archaeological treasures. So, whenever, excavations are conducted, they should inform and consult archaeologists, so that such hidden valuable materials are not destroyed. Now, Amaravati has been proposed as the new capital of Andhrapradesh after bifurcation of AP, but, this area has been potential for many hidden archaeological monuments and therefore, they cannot be allowed to be destroyed. Therefore, the CM has constituted a committee with experts of archaeology to investigate about the archaeological potential and protect the monuments. He gave many examples of salvage archaeology applied in the case of Nagarjunakonda, Srisailam, Kudali Sangameswarar, Kurudi Goa [rock-cut temple transplanted], Alampur, etc. “God’s property should not be touched”, he emphasized with proverb and saying.

Heritage City – Kanchipuram – S.  Ramakrishna Pisipaty: With slideshow, he has shown exhaustive archaeological evidences to prove that Kanchipuram city and surroundings were continuously engaged with human activities from neolithic, Mesolithic, megalithic, early historic, and medieval periods. A massive 24-m-long turtle-shaped tomb was excavated from the banks of a lake at Vadamangalm village in Kancheepuram district about 80 km from here. While no human skeletons have been discovered yet, initial findings indicate that the people who had inhabited the ancient megalithic site knew mathematics, astronomy and astrology. Explaining “Panchakanchi”, he pointed out how Jaina, Buddha, Vishnu, Shiva and Brahma belief-systems were existing. With his findings on the Vegavati river, he tried to correlate the archaeological evidences with that of Puranic narratives.

Law and rules for Heritage Conservation – S. Vasanthi, Deputy Superintendent archaeologist (Retd), Tamilnadu State Archaeology: She listed out many Acts and Rules, including the following[1]:

Ancient Monuments Preservation Act 1904

The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains [mentioned as AHMASR] Act 1951

AMASR Act 1958

AMASR Rules 1959

AMASR (Amendment and Validation) Act 2010

National Monument Authority Rules, 2011

Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Framing of Heritage Bye laws and Other Functions of Competent Authority) Rules, 2011

Competent Authority Notification

Information on construction activity regulations

1958 and 2010 Acts – Reference

As per the statutory provision, “Ancient Monument” means any structure, erection or monument, or any tumulus or place of interment, or any cave, rock-sculpture, inscription or monolith which is of historical, archaeological or artistic interest and which has been in existence for not less than 100 years and includes— (i) remains of an ancient monument, (ii) site of an ancient monument, (iii) such portion of land adjoining the site of an ancient monument as may be required for fencing or covering in or otherwise preserving such monument, and (iv) the means of access to, and convenient inspection of, an ancient monument; and “Any person who moves any antiquity in contravention of a notification issued under sub-section (1) of section 25 shall be punishable with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees[2]; and the court conviction a person of any such contravention may by order direct such person to restore the antiquity to the place from which it was moved”.

Conservation and preservation of the Monuments in Coastal Areas – J. Soundararajan, Assistant Professor, University of Madras: He too mentioned about Abu Simbel to Nagarjunakonda and then delved upon, temples at Dwaraka, Goa etc. As the monuments on the coasts are easily subjected to soil erosion by sea, change in sea / ocean levels periodically, Tsunami like natural disasters, he explained such instances and the preservation and conservation methods undertaken. There are different natural and manmade factors which are generally considered responsible for different conservation problems and cause damage to the building materials of a monument. Geological and mineralogical defects which develop during the genesis of rocks may be responsible for different conservation problems and consequent damage to the monuments. This is due to inherent weakness of the building materials. There are certain biological factors such as Growth of Moss, Lichen, Algae, Fungi and higher plants on a monument. They not only impart a ugly look to the monument but also cause physical & chemical damaged to the building material. Bat’s and bird’s droppings/excreta cause damage particularly to fine stone works and paintings. Deposit of Bat’s excreta on stone structures in Ajanta Caves caused chemical damages to the structures. Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM) and other chemically active pollutant species along with dust results in disfiguring of the monument. Similarly variation in climatic conditions, moisture and intense solar radiation are also responsible for the decay of specific building materials. Conservation problems are different for different geographical areas. The monuments of coastal areas face the problem of salt efflorescence. Crystallization of soluble salts in the matrix of stone, plaster, mortar etc. is a major cause of damage to the monument. This disrupts the pore structures of the stone and slowly damages the core of the building material which is difficult to be repaired.

Technical-paper presentation – teacher participation: The “teacher participation”, i.e, those who are teaching in colleges presented their papers. My paper came under this category. I presented my paper, “Salvaging, redeeming and Saving Archaeology and Managing Heritage in the Indian Context”. As only 10-15 minutes were given, I restricted to PowerPoint presentation. I specifically pointed out as to how the archaeological reports of ASI were manipulated by the colonial rulers in the cases of Alois Anton Fuhrer[3], John Marshall[4], George Buhler[5], Vincent Smith[6], R. D. Banerhee[7] based on the official documents. Then, I cited and explained the case of Prof Dr Vincent John Adams Flynn who was arrested, jailed and then deported to his country Australia, for smuggling out many antiquities including valuable coins[8]. From colonial period to the present day, the Indian archaeology and historiography have been subjected to professional bias, ideology and politicization, obviously acting againt Indan Acts, Rules and interests. The issue of Ramajanmabhumi and the WAC-III fights need not be mentioned here, as that have already exposed the position of the archaeologists and historians.  Even after independence, the fields of archaeology, historiography, numismatics, epigraphy and other connected fields have been with constant interference of the politicians. Of course, the archaeologists and historians have also become “politicians” as the Ayodhya case exposed, when they deposed before the court as witnesses. With all responsibilities, they had misrepresented and misled the court and hence they have been reprimanded and censured heavily, as has been recorded in the judgment. From outside, they could carry out propaganda through media with vested interests, but, the legal facts remain facts only. Unless, they are liberated from such factors, they cannot render any service to the society and people.

Valedictory function and distribution of prizes: The paper reading session conducted on 29^th November was indeed a competition held for the Ph.D research  scholars and those awaiting for the Viva Voce, with the condition that “Only the papers to be presented by the research scholars will be considered for best paper award” and the amount fixed was as follows: I prize Rs.15,000 /-, II prize Rs.10,000 /- and III prize Rs. 5,000 /-.  Dr G. Maheswari, Superintendent Archaeologist, ASI was the chief guest for the valedictory function. The prizes were distributed to the winning scholars and certificates to the teachers-participants. The seminar closed with national anthem.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

01-12-2016

[1] All Acts and Rules can be downloaded from here: http://asichennai.gov.in/monuments_acts_rules.html; Some important judgemenets have also been given.

Judgement dt.16th January, 2012 of Hon’ble Supreme Court pertaining to construction activity in the prohibited area of national monuments/sites.

Judgement dt.23rd February, 2011of Hon’ble Madras High Court Madurai Bench pertaining to quarry operation near the national monument at Keezhavalavu, Taluk Melur, District Madurai, Tamil Nadu.

Judgement dt.25th January, 2011 of Hon’ble Madras High Court pertaining to construction activity in the prohibited area of national monument at Gangaikondacholapuram, District Ariyalur, Tamil Nadu.

[2] This, she was mentioning as Rs.10/- based on old Act.

[3] A. A. Führer , Antiquities of Buddha Sakyamuni’s Birth-Place in the Nepalese Tarai, Imperial Archaeological Survey Report XXVI (ASI of Northern India Vol. VI), 1898.

[4] Sir John Marshall, An Indian Tiryns and Mycenae: A Forgotten Age Revealed, The Illustrated London News (tabloid in four pages), Vol.165, September 20, 1924.

[5] Charles Allen, The Buddha and Dr Fuhere – An Archaeological Scandal, Has Publishing, London, 2008, see chapter – The Drowning, Lake Constance, 8-9 April 1898, pp.173-200.

[6] Vincent Smith went to Lucknow in September 1898 ‘by order of Government, to enquire into Dr. Führer’s proceedings, and convict him of systematic falsification of his correspondence with several Governments’. In the course of his meeting Smith challenged Führer about his claims to have found an inscribed pre-Ashokan casket: ‘I charged Dr. Führer to his face with that forgery, and he did not attempt to deny it’. Dr. Führer appears to have resigned immediately after the visit. Smith’s account is to be found in ‘Exploration of the Birthplace of Buddha in the Nepal Tarai’, Govt. North-Western Provinces and Oude, PWD Proceedings for August 1899, File No. 49 Misc., 1899, Note 60. ‘Note on the exploration of Kapilavastu, by V. A. Smith, Esq., ICS, dated 3rd January 1898 [sic: 1899]’.

[7] Banerji, Rakhal Das. Mohenjodaro: A Forgotten Report. Prithivi Prakashan, 1984.

[8] Delhi High Court – Mr. V.J.A. Flynn And Mr. Shyam … vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 26 November, 2002; Equivalent citations: 2003 (66) DRJ 381, 2003 (86) ECC 129, 2003 (159) ELT 92 Del; Author: S Aggarwal; Bench: D Jain, S Aggarwal. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/924272/