The proceedings of the National seminar Buddhism and Sectarian Religious faith in India or Buddha and Anti-caste Bhakti Saints held at Acharya Nagarjuna University on March 1st and 2nd 2023 (4)

The proceedings of the National seminar Buddhism and Sectarian Religious faith in India or Buddha and Anti-caste Bhakti Saints held at Acharya Nagarjuna University on March 1^st and 2^nd 2023 (4)

Caste system in Burma / Myanmar: The Burmese authorities presently recognise no fewer than 135 separate ethnic groups out of 55 million population, living within the union. Of these, the Bamar are easily the largest. Myanmar’s first national census in over 30 years. The other six main ethnic groups are –

1. the Shan, 2. Kachin, 3. Kayin,

4. Rakhine, 5. Chin and 6. Mon,

each of which has its own state. These seven main ethnic groups together constitute about 92 per cent, with the remaining 8 per cent divided between a fascinating patchwork of minority tribes. Jane Fergusson discussed the issue as follows[1]: The system of caste, or a hierarchical social system based on occupation, prestige, and ideas about pollution, had been considered a master trope in the framing of the imperial census[2] (Kumar 2006:387), and one which colonial officers had grown accustomed to in British India. Census officials even noted that caste could be tested by ‘actual existing facts and beliefs to a far greater extent than is possible with respect to race’ (Webb[3] 1912:250). However, the categories of caste simply did not gain traction for census officials working in Burma; thus they struggled to find another way to approach human differences and quantify race in Burma. The nine ‘race’ categories used by the British census-takers were:

1. Burmese; 2. Other indigenous race; 3. Chinese;

4. Indians born in Burma; 5. Indians born outside Burma; 6. Indo-Burman race;

7. Europeans and allied races; 8. Anglo-Indians; 9. Other race.

According to C.C. Lowis[4] (1902), the Burman is ‘so absolutely enamoured of freedom that he cannot abide the bonds that caste demands’ (Lowis 1902:107). Without the category of caste, and where religion ‘indicates but little’, colonial surveyors concluded that language would therefore be the most ‘obvious and surest criterion of difference’ (Lowis 1902:112): If the speech of a particular community cannot be assigned to a particular group, that community is, ipso facto, isolated, whatever similarity its customs, dress and physical traits may have with the customs, dress and physical traits of any other community, neighbouring or otherwise.

Caste thennic groups, ethnicity, denomination, sect and such other classification based on race, racism and racialism, religion, theology, philosophy etc., exist in Thailand……..

Sectarian, sectarianism, sectarian faith etc: The words and sect, expressions sectarian, sectarianism, sectarian faith etc., have not been positive, but negative and bad in connotation in the western or western religious context. Throughout American history, “sectarian” has been used to exclude and to ostracize. It is a term that is used to disparage and marginalize particular groups of Americans and particular kinds of thinking. That “sectarian” is hardly a flattering term is evident from even a cursory look at any standard dictionary. Among its more common synonyms are “bigoted,” “narrow-minded,” “heretical,” “parochial,” and “dogmatic.” Christians have used the word to describe Pharisees, atheists, and other Christians; Unitarians to put down Presbyterians and Roman Catholics; political liberals and conservatives to insult each other[5]. Richard A. Baer, Jr explains that[6], “The reason is really quite simple. Even though the term “sect” can have the relatively neutral meaning of “a group of persons having the same principles, beliefs, or opinions or can be employed technically in a non-pejorative sense by sociologists of religion, the ordinary usage of “sectarian” is derogatory. Indeed, “sectarian” more often than not is what we might call “caste language.” It is a term that has been used throughout much of American history to keep religious and social “untouchables” in their proper place. Just as ruling elites have used racial and sexual epithets to put down blacks and women, so they have used “sectarian” to exclude and marginalize those individuals and groups whose religious or philosophical beliefs or social practices did not correspond to their own vision of what was appropriate in the cultural marketplace”.

The theme of the seminar changed from “Buddhism and Sectarian Religious faith in India,” to   “Buddha and Anti-caste Bhakti Saints”: Though, the topic was “Buddhism and Sectarian Religious faith in India,” (as appeared in the brochure first) most of the paper presenters were trying to interpret the present ideology on the medieval period and even the prehistoric and protohistoric past. It also appears that the theme was changed to “Buddha and Anti-caste Bhakti Saints” suddenly, as noted later on the banner, “Abstract,” scribbling pad etc. Actually, I prepared my paper only based on the such theme and sent my full paper on 31-01-2023 itself. The theme, “Buddhism and Sectarian Religious faith in India,” has been entirely different from that of,   “Buddha and Anti-caste Bhakti Saints.” It is a fact that during the transitional period 7th century to the medieval period till the advent of the Mohammedans and the European colonial forces, all the sectarian faiths had to suffer by them. The ruling and dominant faiths Janism and Buddhism had to suffer from their attacks, in spite of their oversea and inland business and commercial authority. When religious dominance and excesses started, these two could not match up with them (Islam and Christianity). Moreover, the interaction among the believers of Andhra, Karnataka and Tamilagam showed the intra and inter-faith and religious debates, polemics and wrangles, leading to physical sometimes. Obviously, the organizers must have realized from my paper and changed the theme. Therefore, it is evident that they changed the theme itself, perhaps, without informing.

Under the Ambedkarite Constitution, Caste should continue or not: Eleanor Zelliot (1992), Uma Chakravarthi (1996), Gail Omvedt (2003) and others cleverly avoided the continuance of caste in spite of opposing caste, supporting reservation, though opposing positive discrimination, exclusion etc., Thus, the ideological egalitarianism, theoretical Utopianism and sermonized equality always try to and evade the legal, constitutional and judicial position and condition of the prevalent issues. The restricted reservation for SCs has been continuing. The reservation after conversion for the neo-Buddhists, and Sikhs continues, as they are “Hindus” only as per Article 25 of the Constitution. Thus, the Christians and much later the Muslims too started demanding the amendment of the Constitution Order, 1950 to accommodate the converted Christians and Muslims also. Though, these ideologists claim that “The Ambedkar Constitution,” they want to amend it, without realizing the judicial implications.

What is required by the believers in a “Secular state or country”?: Dialogue is required for understanding other and the point of view of others, whether, in a family, society or anywhere, where human interaction takes place. Thus, it is imperative and implied that such a process is possible with all family and societal members. Discussion, debate and deliberation always involve mutual, reciprocated and two-way flow of thought, thought processes and conclusion. Monologue is considered as a speech presented by a single dramatist character, theoretical expert or ideologized professional most often to express their thoughts aloud, though sometimes also to directly address another character or the audience. In theatre, a monologue may be enjoyed when delivered by favourite character or person, as none is going to ask him.   Monologues are common across the range of dramatic media (plays, films, etc.), as well as in non-dramatic media such as poetry, literary narratives, political discourses and other verbose. Monologues share much in common with several other literary devices including soliloquies, apostrophes, and asides. There are, however, distinctions between each of these devices, audience and ideologists. Many times such monologues, particularly thrusted, imposed and forced to listen lead to autocratic, dominating and dictatorial. Free speech is talked about and sermonized blaming others as despotic, tyrannical, repressive, oppressive and so on, but, how such whistle-blowers indulge.

In dialogue, the engaged parties should listen to and understand the other party / parties also: There is a maxim Audi Alteram Partem and it is not known whether monologuers could understand and realize it. It means hear the other side; hear both sides, in other words the authority hearing the matter must be afforded hearing to the party who is likely to be affected by its decision. In judicial, quasi-judicial or any sensible legal process, it is expected. Therefore, those who talk about thesis, anti-thesis and synthesis should not avoid or be afraid of Audi Alteram Partem. Here, most of the speakers have predetermined mind-set and they spoke even any prepared paper about certain premises and conditions only in their perspective, that too blaming Brahmin, Brahman, Brahminism, Brahminical system, and even Brahminical virus and so on. Inside, “Acharya Nagarjuna University,” though such seminar was taking place under the auspices of “The Mahayana Buddhist Study Centre,” the sectarian bias had been explicit and aggressive and combating.

Justice, natural justice, social justice, equity, equality etc: Though, often Justice, natural justice, social justice, equity, equality etc, are talked about, they are not obviously discussed judicially. There are mainly two Principles of Natural Justice. These two Principles are:

• ‘Nemo judex in causa sua’. No one should be made a judge in his own cause, and the rule against bias.
• ‘Audi alteram partem’ means to hear the other party, or no one should be condemned unheard.

The historians, archaeologists, anthropologists, archaeo-anthropologists, Anthropo-archaeologists, sociologists, psychologists and related experts do not deal with these important conditions to pass any remarks or come to conclusions. Going to extremes, violating the norms that are framed the ideologists by themselves, and jumping to conclusions with biased views have been the hall-mark of many such studies.

How the audience was responding to the Buddhist prayer……..

How the audience was responding to the Buddhist prayer…………………..

How I struggled to reach and left Vijayawada Railway Station: How I reached Vijayawada Railway station was explained above on Fenbruary 28^th midnight and March 1^st early morning. On 2^nd March also, I had a different experience to reach the Vijayawada station. The seminar paper presentation was going on, as I had to catch the train, I came out of the hall searching for the driver. He was there, and we had lunch quickly and about to leave, but, I was informed that some other driver and vehicle would come. So I was waiting…….and the time was 2.00 pm. I asked the convener many times and I was informed “the vehicle would come.”  It was 2.30 PM and then, realizing the situation, I was taken by a car. Of course, the driver and car were there only[7]. Anyway, the driver could drop me at the end of the platform, so that I could walk to the platform[8]. Slowly, I started walking with the bag to the Platform No.10 where, the JanSatabdi was to come. When I reached PF.No.10, the passenger started running back, shouting at me, that it was here at PF.No.8. Some stranger helped me taking my bag and I started walking slowly. It took me perhaps 10 to 15 minutes and the train was about to start. I was waving my hand towards the train, as if I was doing it for a bus to stop. But, the driver was looking at me and showed his finger “1,” obviously, he might wait for one minute. Meanwhile that stranger handed over my bag to another stranger and went away. When I came near to the train, he (the second stranger) suggested me to gt into the first carriage and pushed my luggage inside. The moment I entered the train and started requesting to the TTR, one youth asked me to sit in one seat, as he was not travelling and got down……….The train started…..So finally, I settled down there in the same compartment, instead of my regular / confirmed seat away from the first compartment[9]. At last I could reach Chennai with 20 minutes delay. My regular Auto driver came and I could reach home by 11.40 PM.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

05-03-2023

---

[1] Ferguson, Jane M. “Who’s Counting?: Ethnicity, Belonging, and the National Census in Burma/Myanmar.” Bijdragen tot de taal-, land-en volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia 171.1 (2015): 1-28.

[2] Kumar, M. Satish (2006). ‘The census and women’s work in Rangoon, 1872–1931’, Journal of Historical Geography 32:377–97.

[3] Webb, C. Morgan (1912). Census of India, 1911. Vol. ix, Burma Part i. Report. Rangoon: Office of Superintendent, Government Printing and Stationery.

[4] Lowis, C.C. (1902). Census of India, 1901. Volume xii, Burma. Part i. Report. Rangoon: Office of Superintendent, Government Printing and Stationery

[5] Richard A. Baer, Jr. The Supreme Court’s Discriminatory Use of the Term “Sectarian”, Originally published in The Journal of Law & Politics, Vol. VI, No. 3, Spring 1990.

[6] https://blogs.cornell.edu/envirobaer/publications/the-supreme-courts-discriminatory-use-of-the-term-sectarian/

[7]  In other words, instead of keeping me waiting there for nearly one-and-half hours, I could have been sent earlier with the same driver and car. Why I was kept delayed was known to God only.

[8]  Actually, the driver helped me in reaching the station in time and also dropping at the right place. Of course, when we reached the Guest House to take the luggage, the other person / Assistant Professor was making unwanted comments that I would miss the train and so on. Though, he had also to come with me, he was delaying, so the driver took the decision to proceed, as the time was already 2.30 PM. Why the learned Asst.Prof was delaying was also known only to God.

[9] I can write a story about this, as how many strangers helped me to get into a train, sit comfortably in a seat and reach my home at one side, whereas, at the other side – all learned professors etc., but made me tensed fully knowing my health problems. Of course, I informed my travel plan, my health problem etc through e-mails and letter also (with many phone calls in between).

Proceedings of the National seminar “Impact of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar’s Philosophy on Indian Literature” held at the Acharya Nagarjuna University on March 28th and 29th 2018 (3)

Proceedings of the National seminar “Impact of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar’s Philosophy on Indian Literature” held at the Acharya Nagarjuna University on March 28^th and 29^th 2018 (3)

Vijayakumar presenting his paper

Koreswar moderating the session

View of the audience listening to the presentation, session chaired by Koteswar

View of the audience listening to the presentation, session chaired by Koteswar

29-03-2018 – morning – paper reading session: The venue was shifted to LHS auditorium “Venugopal Reddy Auditorium.” The first session was chaired by Koteswara Rao with the following paper presentation:

11.00 am: First paper touched upon the impact of Ambedkar philosophy on the Marathi literature.

Bendalam Krishna Rao, journalist presenting his paper

11.14 am: Krishna Rao pointed out as to how the modern dalit Telugu poets have been inspired and influenced by the Ambedkar philosophy. He stressed under the guise of “dalit literature,” other castes need not be blasphemed or attacked excessively.

Kanchan Jeyaraj presenting paper, working with M-TV

11.28 am: Kanchana Jeyaraj, with M-TV pointed out that the media has been suppressing the facts of attacks on dalits. “Though, many cases were filed, only few punished; the fight was not only between the dalits and BCs, but also with MBCs, and others; Ambedkar accused media as “Congress papers,” as they did not publish what he said, but adding or removing certain words changing the context. Now also, same trend prevails and only M-TV broadcast atrocities committed against dalits.   SC government officials, councillors, and others do not come to media and discuss about the atrocities committed against dalits, as they are controlled by the party-politics. Therefore, SCs should dominate media to create impact on the society.”

Dilip Matangi presentation

11.47 am: Matangi Dilipkumar explained about his magazine, “Bhimbum” and how the advertisements given to it, were stopped. As some body pointed out, he accepted that attacking “Brahmana and Brahmanavada” are different. If SC is raisen up, come up and occupying a big post, he does not want to fight like “street-fighters,” but, chosen to be within their rooms.

Ambedkar seminar, ANU, 2018- Vijayakumar presenting paper

12.34 pm: Vijayakumar, equated “Aryanism” with “Brahmanism” and continued his rhetoric. Only when Ambedkar brought out “Mukhnayak,” the Congress’ “National Herald” changed its attitude.

12.50 pm : Tangirala Soni sang a song.

12.54: Suresh Kumar[1] presented his paper, “Dalit literature: Movement in Andhra Pradesh,” repeating the points already made by other paper presenters. He pointed out as to how Basava, Annamacharya, Vemana, Veerabrahmam and others opposed caste system. He pointed out that non-dalit literature writers also contributed to dali literature.

1.03 pm: Ratna rendered a poem.

29-03-2018 – afternoon- paper reading session: The second session started with the paper presentation of the following:

Ambedkar seminar, ANU, 2018- M. Srinivasa Rao presenting paper

1.10 pm: M. Srinivasa Rao[2] presented his paper, “Annihilation of caste system – Thoughts of Dr B. R. Ambedkar,” wherein, he brought out the points, “Caste dominates all in India…even Christians follow caste system..One poet asked, that they wanted a “OC-Christ”….A caste is a social group having two characteristics  (a) membership is confined to those who are born of members and includes all persons so born and (b) the members are forbidden by an inexorable social law to marry outside the group..thus caste system is maintained…it has to be broken following the path pf Ambedkar.”

1.30 pm: Ramesh Babu argued that, “.there is no Indian literature to be called so…Charuvaka started questioning…..so also Buddha thereafter….in modern times, Ambedka questioned….as the culture of Aryans was animistic, that is not relating to India.”

Ambedkar seminar, ANU, 2018-Anathalakshmi presenting paper

1.36 pm: Anathalakshmi[3] presented her paper on “Dr B. R. Ambedkar’s perspective of Indian women,” in which, she argued that “……Ambedkar deems that Buddha treated women with esteem and adoration and never attempted to humiliate them like Manu…on 25-12-1927, he burned a copy of “Manu Smriti”…He attended Women Conference on 18-07-1942……he incorporated provisions for women in the Indian Constitution including Uniform Civil Code under Article 44….Ambedkar brought out Acts for the benefit of women.In fact, Brahmin like Gajendra Gadekar supported Ambedkar, but, Nehru opposed and thus, the Hindu code Bill did not pass…. ”

Ambedkar seminar, ANU, 2018-K. V. Ramakrishna Rao presenting paper

1.50 pm: K. V. Ramakrishna Rao[4] presented his paper, “A comparative study of Socio-religious and Political philosophy of Dr B. R.Ambedkar and Periyar EVR,” contrasting the ideologies and philosophies of both under specific topics and issues – Education and background of the personalities; Marriage – marring a woman who was attending to them; Aryans, Dravidians and Race hypotheses and theories; Depressed Clases and Jews – how compared and treated by Ambedkar and Periyar; Brahmins and Jews – how compared and treated by Ambedkar and Periyar; Ambedkar, Periyar  and Cripps (1940-42); How Gandhi was dealt with by Ambedkar and EVR; The question of Communism – how affected EVR and Ambedkar -Whether the three leaders were exploited by the Marxist ideology?[5]; after independence how they acted and reacted. For Ambedkar the 1940-1956 and EVR 1940-1973 periods were very crucial in assessing them[6]. From 1956 to 1992, the dravidian parties did not care Ambedkar, but, after 06-12-1992, they started exploiting him as a symbol. In fact, initially, Ambedkar’s statues were opposed in Tamilnasdu, as he was not a Tamilian and they were challenged with the Thevar statues. The literature produced by the Dravidian protagonists, Communist comrades and others exploited Ambedkar, but, maintained their ideology[7]. As there was no provision, he could not present PP with scanned documents brought.

29-03-2018 – after lunch- paper reading session: After lunch, the session continued with paper presentation.

2.50 pm: E. Harshavardhanan again continued with paper, repeating the same points yesterday presented.

Ambedkar seminar, ANU, 2018- G. Satyanarayana, psychologist presenting paper

3.05 pm: G. Satyanarayana[8] presented his paper, “Personality of Dr B. R. Ambedkar: Pasychological Analysis” took his personality traits like conscientiousness, extroversion, openness and self-actualization and concluded that no “neuroticism” features are found in such analysis. Being a psychology expert, initially, he was so emotional and controlled himself and then, started his presentation.

Ambedkar seminar, ANU, 2018- Santakumari presenting paper

3.19 pm: Shantakumari presented her paper based on a drama written by Vijaya Bhaskara “Kurchi” (Chair) and compared with reservation made to SCs.

3.31 pm: Amruta Rao presented a paper about the impact of Ambedkar philosophy on Telugu literature. The same points already made were repeated.

Ambedkar seminar, ANU, 2018- Aruna Gogulamanda presentation

3.41 pm:  Aruna Gogulamanda delved upon the Ambedkar philosophy on the dalit literature.

3.55 pm:

4.20 pm: Urmila and Sarita

4.27 pm: Sarita presented a paper comparing untouchability issue as depicted in the story of Munshi Premchand with that of Ambedkar philosophy.

4.30 pm: Nagamani  presented a paper on caste system.

Valedictory function: Valedictory function had been formal and the participants were asked to express their views.  N. Ravikumar pointed out that those who have not read Ambedkar books or understood him presented papers. His BRV has been working for the last three years for the welfare of the Ambedkarites fighting for their rights. The dilution of the SC-At Act by the Supreme Court recently has to be discussed seriously. One should write about their mother, then, only, the Ambedkarite consciousness could be nurtured and developed. The views expressed by the participants:

1. The Ambedkar philosophy should be brought out in the “artform” [street play, burra katha etc] to reach people.
2. Reserved seats for SCs – SCs should be careful to vote, as some SC-leaders become political agents / “yes-servants” thus defeating the very purpose of “reserved constituencies.”
3. BSP party leaders asserted that BSP experiment is enough and no other /new experiment is required.
4. The Communist exploitation of Ambedkar, Ambedkarites and Dalits should be checked and controlled.
5. The Communists do not have the photo of Ambedkar in their party officers, as they cannot place anybody at par with Marx, Lenin, Mao etc., therefore, exploiting Ambedkar and getting funds by them should be stopped.

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

31-03-2018

[1] See Abstarcts, p.17.

[2] See Abstarcts, p.35-36.

[3] See Abstarcts, p.34-35.

[4] See Abstarcts, p.28-29.

[5] K. V. Ramakrishna Rao, The Impact of Communism on the Dravidian Movement 1930-40, proceedings of the South Indian Congress 13^th session held at Government Arts College, Coimbatore, January 9^th to 11^th, 1993, pp.200-205.

Rao, K.V. Ramakrishna. “The Impact of Communism on the Dravidian Movement, 1930-40.” In Ethnic Movement in Transition: Ideology and Culture in a Changing Society, Kanishk Publishers, New Delhi, (1998): 87.

154. V. Ramakrishna Rao, The Impact of Communism on Dravidian Movement 1940-50, a paper presented at the 15^th session of THHC held at Periyar Maniammai University, Vallam, September 19^th-21^st, 2008 and published in the PTNHC, pp.150-154.

[6] K. V. Ramakrishna Rao, The Historic Meeting of Ambedkar, Jinnah and Periyar, Proceedings of 21^st session of South Indian History Congress, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, 2001, , pp.128-136.

[7]  The literature produced by Periyar, Anna, Karunanidi had been divisive and anti-national; M. P. Sivagnanam has been of nationalistic;  B. Ramamurthy nationalistic and communist; DK-radical Dravidian groups Marxist, Maoist and anti-national; Ayothithas Pandithar, Erattaimalai Srinivasan ettc., Buddhist, Ambedkarite and nationalist.

[8] See Abstarcts, p.11-12.

Proceedings of the National seminar “Impact of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar’s Philosophy on Indian Literature” held at the Acharya Nagarjuna University on March 28th and 29th 2018 (1)

Proceedings of the National seminar “Impact of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar’s Philosophy on Indian Literature” held at the Acharya Nagarjuna University on March 28^th and 29^th 2018 (1)

ANU – administrative building

Attending another seminar on Ambedkar quickly: As I got the information about the National Seminar on “Impact of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar’s Philosophy on Indian Literature” to be conducted by Acharya Nagarjuna University [hereinafter mentioned as ANU], Dr. Ambedkar Chair, Nagarjuna Nagar – 522 510, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, and Bahujana Rachayitala Vedika[1] [hereinafter mentioned as BRV], A.P, only on 25^th March 2018, immediately, I prepared a paper and sent by e-mail on the same day, as it was the last day for the submission of abstract. The seminar was Sponsored by: Dr. Ambedkar Foundation, 15 Janpath, New Delhi, Govt. of India, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment[2]. I booked tickets immediately and informed Dr S. Murali Mohan about my travel  plan.

ANU – old guest house, last time, I stayed here

About the Ambedkar Study Centre – Chair: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Chair was established in 1993, supported by Dr. Ambedkar Foundation, New Delhi, Govt. of India, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment Dr. B.R. Ambedkar who is hailed as the father of constitution, played an important role in the constitutional Development and emancipation of the deprived classes. The objectives of the chair include to study, to propagate the philosophy of Dr. Ambedkar among the society, to encourage students of M.Phil and Ph.D. courses and other scholars to work on Dr. Ambedkar and Dalit literature, to organize seminars, symposia, lectures on Dr. Ambedkar’s life, work and ideology and to provide a common platform to the scholars working on Dr. Ambedkar’s thoughts in India and abroad to share their views and experiences. Registration, Boarding and Lodging Delegates, who want to participate, can register by email giving details of their name, address, Mobile number, travel plan to e-mail: ambedkarchairanu@gmail.com. All out station participants will be provided, free accommodation, in the University Guest house/hostels. Local hospitality will be Extended to all the participants during the days of the Seminar.

ANU – New guest house

About the Seminar on Ambedkar Philosophy: Babasaheb Dr. B.R.Ambedkar, the chief architect of Indian Constitution and versatile genius, had striven his best for making of modern India. His ideas on making modern India are highly influential and remarkable. One can identify the impact of Ambedkar’s philosophy in the spheres of Indian polity and administration, judiciary, economy, gender policy, literature and so on. His non-Brahmanical theory brought awakening among the people of downtrodden sections of the society. He is the critique of all aspects of Brahmanical order. Dr.Ambedkar challenged all sorts of discrimination and bias and proposed the theory of democracy in all sorts of Indian society. In fact he a Jurist, Constitutional expert, Economist, Sociologist and a literary scholar in his essence. He has produced a vast amount of literature, wherein he has analysed different systems and framed an alternative methods. In fact he is a literary critique, carried out an in depth study on Hindu Mythological literature, composed in Sanskrit literature. He himself is scholar of Pali literature. His social philosophy highly influenced the literary scholars. The impact of Dr. Ambedkar on novelists, story writers, play wrights, lyricists, and poets of modern bperiod can be seen since four decades in different Indian languages. When the Dalit self identity struggle initiated during the decade of 1980 in Andhra Pradesh, anabundant literature was produced by the writers, based on the anti-caste methodology of Dr. Ambedkar. He has become a driving force in the activism and creation of protest literature by the writers from Dalit and other downtrodden sections of the society. The present National Seminar on ‘Impact of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar’s Philosophy on Indian Literature’ aims at focussing on the analysing the influence of Ambedkar’s thought on Indian Literature & Telugu literature in general and protest literature in particular.

ANU – old guest house.view inside

Sub-themes of the Seminar: As usual, the sub-themes are also mentioned as follows:

1.       Ambedkar as a philosopher 2.      Ambedkar’s ideas on literature 3.      Ambedkar and Dalit Literature 4.      Ambedkar and Early Phase of Dalit Protest Literature 5.      Ambedkar and Protest Literature since 1980’s

6.      Dalit Poetry & Song 7.      Dalit Story 8.     Dalit Novel 9.      Dalit Short Story 10.  Dalit Auto-biography 11.   Dalit Journalism 12.  Individual Writers 13.  Literary Criticism

ANU – canteen where coffee taken

Call for Papers: Papers with research and scholastic outlook are invited from scholars who desire to present their views, ideas, paradigms and visions on the them with references. The papers (soft and hard copies) are to be sent to the Director of the Seminar. The papers will be published in the form of an edited book, which are accepted by the editorial board. Guidelines for Contribution – The contributors are requested to follow the guidelines given below while sending their manuscript. Fonts: Arial, Times New Roman, Font Size: 12 pt, Margins: 2.6 cm, Abstract: 300 words, Full Length Paper: 5 pages, of A4 size. Soft copy of the Paper along with one hard copy, mentioning the name, surname, organization represented, address, telephone number, e-mail address of contributor(s), with references at the end of the text, should be sent to the Director of the Seminar.

ANU – Philosopy of Ambedkar, interpreted differently by researchers

Registration: Those who are interested to participate in the seminar can register by mailing the following information. Name, Designation, Mailing address, Mobile number, e-mail, Abstract of the Paper and Journey details before 25th March 2018. Registration Fee Rs. 500/. Good Research Papers will be published in a book form with ISSN No. About the reimbursement of travel expenditure, nothing was mentioned. I reached Vijayawada by Pinakini Express on 27^th night. As the train was late, I could reach 10.40 pm, the vehicle came there, dropped me at the Guest House of the ANU.

Bhahishkrut Bharath – one of the journals brought out by Ambedkar

What is Ambedkar’s philosophy?: A. M. Rajasekaraiah[3] pointed out, “Dr. Ambedkar was not a philosopher in the generally accepted sense. He did not develop a philosophy for its own sake. He was not a theoretician and theory-building was not his objective. As a researcher, thinker and writer he, no doubt, belonged to the realm of thought. He developed his ideas about man, society and their interrelationship. He was having all the ingredients of a thinker and a philosopher.” Philosophy of Ambedkar has been projected by the scholars as a complex in nature which was not the case, as Valerian Rodrigues noted[4]. Bringing down to Ambedkar for a single perspective could not be possible because he was read through Buddhism, Pragmatism, Marxism and Deweyian approach. Scholars like Pradeep Gokhale appropriated Amedkar’s political and philosophical dimensions with true sense of understanding. According to him Ambedkar ideas are Different in different dimensions not limited to single perspective; it is always multi character in nature. Ambedkar’s understanding of religion can be an example for his rational and scientific understands exceeding their limits. For the purpose of this, Ambedkar reformed Buddhism before he converted. He endorsed methodological anxiety – but sustained through universal standards. While doing so he could maintain statuesque as a rationalist – his apprehension for fundamental and universal principles. In democracy equality is the ultimate goal and Ambedkar influenced constitution making, incorporation of fundamental rights, directive principles of the State policy and reservations for SC/STs and such measures of equality and social justice in the constitution.

Ambedkar brought out several journals Mukhnayak, Bhahiskrut Bharat etc

Dalit literature and the impact of Ambedkar: Aboout the word “dalit” much is debated in the political and legal context, though, it is promonently and liberally used in literary and journalistic writings[5]. As literature flies with imagination, it is not controlled by any legal, judicial and constitutional restrictions and limits. The literary and journalistic juggernaut has succeeded and justified in establishing the usage of the expression “dalit.” The “depressed class”, “scheduled caste”, “Haijan” etc., have been replaced by “dalit” now. Though, it is not found in the Ambedkar’s writing, it is persistently claimed that he used. Anyway, the Constitution is his contribution. The National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) issued a circular in January 2008, directing the district collectors not to use the word “Dalit” as it is neither constitutional nor mentioned in the current laws. Rather ‘scheduled Caste’ is the appropriate and notified word as per the Article 341 of the Constitution, it said in a letter sent to all states[6].

© K. V. Ramakrishna Rao

31-03-2018

Philosopy of Ambedkar – dalit literature

[1] Dr. N. Ravi Kumar, General Secretary, Bahujana Rachayitala Vedika, A.P., Contact no: 9848187416

e.mail: rnukathoti@yahoo.in.

[2] Dr. Ambedkar Foundation was established by the Government of India under the aegis of the Ministry of Welfare (now Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment) on March 24, 1992 as a registered society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.http://ambedkarfoundation.nic.in/html/aboutus/aboutdaf16.pdf

[3] Rajasekhariah, A. M., and Hemalata Jayaraj. “Political Philosophy of Dr. BR Ambedkar.” The Indian Journal of Political Science 52.3 (1991): 357-375.

[4] Rodrigues, Valerian. “Ambedkar as a Political Philosopher.” Economic & Political Weekly 52.15 (2017): 101.

[5] Prasad, Amar Nath, and M. B. Gaijan, eds. Dalit literature: a critical exploration. Sarup & Sons, 2007.

[6] New Indian Express, Dalit word unconstitutional, says SC Commission, Jan 18, 2008, http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Dalit-word-unconstitutional-says-SC-Commission/262903/